[Bug 169754] Review Request: tclxml - XML parsing package for Tcl
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Dec 3 19:27:29 UTC 2005
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: tclxml - XML parsing package for Tcl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169754
jpmahowald at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-03 14:27 EST -------
Good:
- rpmlint only complains about the no docs on -devel -expat and -libxml2,
ignored as described in comment 2
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (BSD-like) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on FC4 i386
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file
- devel package ok
- no .la files
- devel requires base package n-v-r
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list