buildsystem not taking jobs?

[Ralf Corsepius]

On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 10:13 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 15:03 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 08:04 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 21:14 -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:

> > Any chances to see this fixed?
> > 
> > x86_64:
> > 
> > Error: Missing Dependency: libdl.so.2 is needed by package libsetrans
> > Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by package
> > libsetrans
> > Error: Missing Dependency: libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) is needed by package
> > libsetrans
> 
> An investigation yields:
> 
> dist/fc5/libsetrans/0.1.11-2/x86_64> rpm -qp --requires libsetrans-0.1.11-2.x86_64.rpm
> /sbin/ldconfig
> libc.so.6
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1)
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3)
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)
> libdl.so.2
> libselinux.so.1
> 
> So the x86_64 libsetrans appears to be linked against an i686 glibc [1].
> Which obviously won't always be provided on an x86_64 system.  So it
> appears that, as I said, it's rawhide issues not specific to the build
> system.

Hmm, so rawhide is silently broken because of a mis-compiled package,
and your rawhide "dependency checker" fails to detect it?

That's at least how I read the last couple (all since Thursday( of
"rawhide reports", such as today's
(https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2005-December/msg00317.html) which don't contain any indication on such kind of problem.

Ralf