[Bug 174278] Review Request: tcldom - XML DOM bindings for Tcl
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Dec 13 21:47:02 UTC 2005
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: tcldom - XML DOM bindings for Tcl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174278
jpmahowald at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jpmahowald at gmail.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-13 16:46 EST -------
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (BSD) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on FC4 i386
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file
- devel package ok
- devel requires base package n-v-r
However,
- Have you tested this on 64 bit? %{_libdir} may prove problematic
- BuildRoot should be cleaned at the beginning of %install.
- A bunch of compiler warnings, particularly in tcldomlibxml2.c. Be sure to tell
upstream about this, and show them your patch.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list