[Bug 176096] Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Dec 20 17:53:27 UTC 2005


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gentium-fonts: SIL Gentium fonts


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176096


jpmahowald at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
OtherBugsDependingO|163776                      |163778
              nThis|                            |




------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com  2005-12-20 12:53 EST -------
- rpmlint doesn't like the license, but their FAQ states it can be packaged.
http://scripts.sil.org/OFL
- package meets naming guidelines, somewhat like urw-fonts
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license text in %doc
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream (you may want to leave a comment about where to find
the source)
- package compiles on FC4 i386
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file

Also similar to bitstream-vera-fonts spec file.

Installed package, fonts appeared in char map and OpenOffice.org, gone upon
package removal.

Looks good to me. However, you still need a sponsor. Perhaps we can find one of
them interested interested in fonts.



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list