[Bug 176288] Review Request: kdemulimedia-extras

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Dec 20 23:28:00 UTC 2005


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: kdemulimedia-extras


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=176288


dennis at ausil.us changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |dennis at ausil.us




------- Additional Comments From dennis at ausil.us  2005-12-20 18:27 EST -------
quick check so far.  I built on x86_64 Rawhide box.    
   
[dennis at rpclnx001 ~]$ rpmlint   
redhat/RPMS/x86_64/kdemultimedia-extras-3.5.0-2.x86_64.rpm   
E: kdemultimedia-extras obsolete-not-provided juk   
E: kdemultimedia-extras invalid-soname /usr/lib64/libarts_akode.so   
libarts_akode.so   
W: kdemultimedia-extras no-documentation   
   
we at least need to have the License in documentation   
i dont think the obsolete is needed.  and not sure if the invalid-soname is a   
big deal.   
  
  
some bad  
  
[dennis at rpclnx001 SPECS]$ md5sum ../SOURCES/kdemultimedia-3.5.0.tar.bz2  
3bead58887f06af59afabdc542532bb0  ../SOURCES/kdemultimedia-3.5.0.tar.bz2  
[dennis at rpclnx001 SPECS]$ md5sum kdemultimedia-3.5.0.tar.bz2  
dd0ba9ccb2f522508c6543cd24e54c98  kdemultimedia-3.5.0.tar.bz2  
source md5sum  doesnt match upstream  if you used the tarball from the fedora  
package  then it needs to be noted and not use the path to kde's website  
  
path to the upstream tarball is invalid  it should  be   
ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/3.5/src/kdemultimedia-3.5.0.tar.bz2  
you cant substitute the stable/3.5/  for stable/%{version}/  
  
  
im tryinga build now with upstream tarball.  the akode patch fails to apply.  
   

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list