[Bug 174181] Review Request: python-simpy Python simulation framework
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Dec 21 05:22:24 UTC 2005
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-simpy Python simulation framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174181
jpmahowald at gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|gdk at redhat.com |jpmahowald at gmail.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald at gmail.com 2005-12-21 00:22 EST -------
SimGUI doesn't work, rpm isn't picking up that it needs Tkinter. Requires:
tkinter needed.
The spec file doesn't seem to be encoded in ASCII or URF-8. Please save in one
or the other. file says "python-simpy.spec: lex description text"
Follows python spec template
- rpmlint does not output anything
I would not call this python-simpy, simpy is sufficient, as it is not a python
extension but a SIMulation in PYthon. Debian seems to call it python-simpy,
however. Your choice.
You removed the source documentation. Consider packaging it as a seperate docs
subpackage.
The patch removes all shebangs. Why, is this to quiet rpmlint?
- license (LGPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on FC4 i386, is noarch
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list