snort ?

[Daniel Wittenberg]

Ok, maybe stupid to assume nobody follows it, but I haven't seen any
packages that actually follow it.

Dan

On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 20:03 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 11:37:23 -0600, Daniel Wittenberg wrote:
> 
> > I'm certainly open to making the changes if you want to send them my
> > way.  Once they are pushed into the main cvs for snort then hopefully it
> > shouldn't need to be updated again.
> > 
> > Can we dump the stupid naming convention since it appears nobody really
> > follows it anyway?
> 
> It's stupid to assume that "nobody really follows it". Every package at
> fedora.us follows it with good reason. Fedora Extras no longer needs to
> follow it, and hence the 0.fdr. prefix is gone.
> 
> --
> fedora-extras-list mailing list
> fedora-extras-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050203/dfa197d1/attachment.sig>