snort ?

[Daniel Wittenberg]

I am obviously missing something, so I'm gonna just sit back and watch
the list now.  When I look at the package names at:

http://download.fedora.us/fedora/fedora/3/i386/RPMS.os/

That's why I said I had never seen the naming convention followed.  I
realize there aren't enough hours in the day to get everything done, but
when the information I have found on naming convention doens't match
what I see the repo's, that is where my statement comes from.  I
understand what you are saying, but that doesn't match what is shown on
the website, and how am I supposed to know that what is on the website
is wrong and outdated ?  If there is a new one I'd like to see it
because I'm obviously confused and would like to understand how things
are going to work.  I'm not trying to start a fight or anything, just
I'm very confused and have been willing to help push snort out and
contribute what little I can to opensource.

For now I'll just sit and watch and maybe I can learn something since I
seem to be doing more harm than good.

Dan

> Daniel, please stop here acting like this. I wrote explicitly that
> _all_ packages in fedora.us adhere to those naming guidelines. See
> quote below.
> 
> With regard to the old fedora.us Wiki, it's closed and no longer
> updated. See Wiki main page. And yes, in the newer fedoraproject.org
> Wiki, the same information could be removed. But every day has just
> 24 hours, developers are busy with other stuff, and hardly anyone
> did miss the changes in Fedora pre-Extras and CVS.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050203/ac7f95b2/attachment.sig>