Are packages in Fedora Extras not being QA?

Brian Pepple bdpepple at ameritech.net
Wed Feb 2 21:47:12 UTC 2005


On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 11:28 -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
> For now treat the newer packages in Extras as rawhide-ish.  Just file a 
> Bugzilla report.  The owner is supposed to be responsible for fixing it.

Looks like two bugs were filed against it already, but were closed
without any apparent action.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=143285
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=143284


/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bdpepple at ameritech.net>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050202/7632f5c2/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list