snort ?

[Brian Pepple]

On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 13:26 -0600, Daniel Wittenberg wrote:
> This includes using fdr in the package name, which nobody really follows
> anyway, which is why I think it's stupid as a standard because nobody
> follows it include the official Fedora package maintainers.  If it is
> legacy it should be removed.

Wasn't that addressed in Michael's reply?

On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 20:03 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> It's stupid to assume that "nobody really follows it". Every package at
> fedora.us follows it with good reason. Fedora Extras no longer needs to
> follow it, and hence the 0.fdr. prefix is gone.

/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bdpepple at ameritech.net>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050203/a60e276d/attachment.sig>