snort ? (last time)

[Daniel Wittenberg]

Well, I'll dump those tags from the official RPMs, but it sounds like
the general consensus is to start fresh and not use the old .spec.  So
for now I'll just watch and see what people come up with, and maybe see
if we can roll the changes to the normal ones.  I have no personal
attachment to maintaining these, just figured I'd try to keep from
duplicating effort.

Dan



On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 14:39 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 13:29 -0600, Daniel Wittenberg wrote:
> > Sorry guys, I really didn't mean to be such a PITA about this, so I
> > think I'll just shutup now and let you guys do what you think is right.
> > 
> 
> It's not a pita. It's just growing pains.
> 
> in short:
> 
> the .fdr. tags are history. Don't worry with them.
> 
> We don't do repo tags/branding with fedora extras packages so don't fret
> with them.
> 
> If you have a specific release tag question, float it here  and we'll
> get it sorted and hopefully documented as we go.
> 
> Cool?
> 
> -sv

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050203/2e517b53/attachment.sig>