[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: snort ?

On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 13:28:28 -0600, Daniel Wittenberg wrote:

> Ok, maybe stupid to assume nobody follows it, but I haven't seen any
> packages that actually follow it.

Daniel, please stop here acting like this. I wrote explicitly that
_all_ packages in fedora.us adhere to those naming guidelines. See
quote below.

With regard to the old fedora.us Wiki, it's closed and no longer
updated. See Wiki main page. And yes, in the newer fedoraproject.org
Wiki, the same information could be removed. But every day has just
24 hours, developers are busy with other stuff, and hardly anyone
did miss the changes in Fedora pre-Extras and CVS.

> Dan
> On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 20:03 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Thu, 03 Feb 2005 11:37:23 -0600, Daniel Wittenberg wrote:
> > 
> > > I'm certainly open to making the changes if you want to send them my
> > > way.  Once they are pushed into the main cvs for snort then hopefully it
> > > shouldn't need to be updated again.
> > > 
> > > Can we dump the stupid naming convention since it appears nobody really
> > > follows it anyway?
> > 
> > It's stupid to assume that "nobody really follows it". Every package at
> > fedora.us follows it with good reason. Fedora Extras no longer needs to
> > follow it, and hence the 0.fdr. prefix is gone.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]