More python x86_64 packages (Was Re: pexpect spec/srpm)
Toshio
toshio at tiki-lounge.com
Sun Feb 6 05:51:42 UTC 2005
Hi Aurélien,
Thanks for testing the pexpect changes. I have some more packages to
test if they build on x86_64:
Packages slightly modifed from Fedora Extras SRPMS:
straw
http://www.tiki-lounge.com/~toshio/fedora/straw-0.22.1-5.src.rpm
pyzor
http://www.tiki-lounge.com/~toshio/fedora/pyzor-0.4.0-7.src.rpm
python-dialog
http://www.tiki-lounge.com/~toshio/fedora/python-dialog-2.0.6-2.src.rpm
Package modified from the update on fedora.us:
gnome-blog
http://www.tiki-lounge.com/~toshio/fedora/gnome-blog-0.8-0.fdr.3.src.rpm
Package already checked:
pexpect
http://www.tiki-lounge.com/~toshio/fedora/pexpect-0.999-2.src.rpm
All of them build on i386. Except for pyzor, I did a minimal test to
see if they'd run after being built as well (which they all did).
(pyzor will run "help" and "discover". Beyond that, I didn't test for
correct operation.)
Assuming these now build and run on x86_64, what's the next step? Does
someone want to check them into CVS on Monday or should I submit diffs
in bugzilla.redhat.com?
-Toshio
PS: Aurélien I noticed that python-dialog has an update on
http://sourceforge.net/projects/pythondialog/
New maintainers, but it looks like a <small> bugfix release.
On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 18:38 +0100, Aurelien Bompard wrote:
> It rebuilds fine, installs fine, and I've tested a few examples shipped with
> it, they seem to work fine.
> This looks good to me :)
>
> Bye,
>
> Aurélien
--
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050206/30c1a56f/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list