More python x86_64 packages (Was Re: pexpect spec/srpm)

[Toshio]

On Sat, 2005-02-05 at 22:16 -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
> Toshio wrote:
> > 
> > Assuming these now build and run on x86_64, what's the next step?  Does
> > someone want to check them into CVS on Monday or should I submit diffs
> > in bugzilla.redhat.com?
> 
> The regular method of tracking issues is filing bugs against those 
> components in Bugzilla and it is the package owner's responsibility to 
> fix them.  This is especially important when there are multiple 
> different issues, because it is otherwise confusing.
> 
> When submitting changes, it is always best to submit unidiff patches 
> rather than full SRPMS, especially when changes are relatively small.

Roger wilco.  I'll make diffs when cvs comes back on Monday and submit
to bugzilla.

Thanks,
-Toshio
-- 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050206/c4d81d08/attachment.sig>