[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Please Follow Procedure, Use CVS comments



Am Samstag, den 12.02.2005, 17:14 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
> On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:29:02 -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
> 
> > gemi and Everyone,
> > 
> > Why was unison and yap requested for build?  There has been no request 
> > on fedora-extras-list for package review, and no APPROVED message on 
> > fedora-extras-commits showing that somebody reviewed it.
> > 
> > (I'm currently using prolog in one of my classes, so I'm interested in 
> > your pl package.  I am reviewing that one now.)
> > 
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-February/msg00208.html
> > Please follow the Interim New Package Process.
> > 
> > This is also a reminder to everyone, please use CVS commit comments when 
> > you commit any change.
> 
> I'd also like to point out that a quick succession of "commit, request
> build in wiki, built and published" makes extras-commits list useless.
> Once built and published, any comments would be too late. Before
> requesting a build, better give your package changes another look and
> test-build them in a clean environment, too. It's not like version
> upgrades and major package changes require urgent builds. Waiting a day
> and giving list observers the chance to comment on changes would be better
> in the beginning.

Okay, shame on me, I did this also. 

But to make this whole situation a bit easier: Is there any reason why
the Interim New Package Process is not yet in the wiki (or did I
overlook it?)? If no one has objections I'm going to import it in the
next days.

-- 
Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora leemhuis info>


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]