[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: netmon_applet



Le mercredi 23 fÃvrier 2005 Ã 11:13 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway a Ãcrit :
>On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 11:07 -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>>Most(some?) of these are simply following the upstream package name 
>>(which is OK, IMO).
>
>pam and SDL are definitely following an upstream naming policy, but in
>lieu of an established policy, there shouldn't be underscores in
>%{name}.
>
They're the exceptions, not the rule.

Well, you can define your established policy as "follow upstream naming
and don't be creative". Lots of people and projects just do that (don't
you hate spec files starting with several defines just to track all the
variations on a common naming a project might use ?)

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]