[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: libcaca



On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 02:43:11PM -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> > >  2. is there a good reason to continue including?
> > 
> > Does it have a willing maintainer?
> 
> This is what I'm asking. Matthias is maintaining it right now, I
> believe, I'm just curious if we want to talk about a minimum 'this is
> stupid' rule for inclusion :)
> 
I don't think there should be a "too stupid" rule.  If someone is willing to
suffer through various upstream problems in order to produce a workable
package because they see value in it, we should include it.  If there are
technical problems with the package then we could exclude it... until the
bugs are fixed.

-Toshio


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]