bug #149713

[David Woodhouse]

On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 17:05 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> IMHO these kind of fixes belong to upstream and that's where they should 
> be reported to begin with, patching FE packages to shut up compiler 
> warnings (especially when talking about a non FC compiler) isn't perhaps 
> the most productive use of packagers' time.

Some compiler warnings warn of harmless things, but this one looks like
a real bug. As it happens, it looks like the references to gc[3] will
actually affect the variable 'use_gc', with unpredictable results.
Probably worth fixing and sending the patch upstream in this case.

-- 
dwmw2