From stfn at gmx.net Sun Jan 2 19:40:27 2005 From: stfn at gmx.net (Stefan Hoelldampf) Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 20:40:27 +0100 Subject: How to report bugs, outdated packages, ... in pre-extras? Message-ID: <41D84E2B.7020304@gmx.net> Hi, which is the right way to report bugs or outdated packages in pre-extras? New entries at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ assigned to "Fedora Extras" and the appropriate component? Mails to this list? Other ways? Example: rdiff-backup is at 0.12.6 but 0.12.7 is the latest stable release. Regards, Stefan From fedora at wir-sind-cool.org Sun Jan 2 19:58:36 2005 From: fedora at wir-sind-cool.org (Michael Schwendt) Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2005 20:58:36 +0100 Subject: How to report bugs, outdated packages, ... in pre-extras? In-Reply-To: <41D84E2B.7020304@gmx.net> References: <41D84E2B.7020304@gmx.net> Message-ID: <20050102205836.1c62e623.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 20:40:27 +0100, Stefan Hoelldampf wrote: > Hi, > > which is the right way to report bugs or outdated packages in pre-extras? > New entries at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ assigned to "Fedora Extras" > and the appropriate component? Yes. > Example: rdiff-backup is at 0.12.6 but 0.12.7 is the latest stable release. Note, however, that the package maintainer may have reasons for not always packaging the most recent release. In case of rdiff-backup, the packager is the author himself. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Sun Jan 2 22:21:44 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 17:21:44 -0500 Subject: Updated/New extras Packages Message-ID: <1104704504.7481.4.camel@cutter> Hi All, Ville updated some spec files and I built them for him. bonnie++ geomview icu perl-Error perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder perl-Module-Build perl-Test-MockObject perl-XML-RSS Those should all be built for x86 and x86_64. Thanks, -sv -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From fedora at leemhuis.info Mon Jan 3 17:17:51 2005 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 18:17:51 +0100 Subject: ghex 64bit build errors. In-Reply-To: <20041227173851.5c1eb547.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> References: <1103749426.1007.32.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> <1104003071.2306.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1104161157.4073.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20041227173851.5c1eb547.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> Message-ID: <1104772671.4317.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Am Montag, den 27.12.2004, 17:38 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt: > On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 16:25:56 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > Am Samstag, den 25.12.2004, 20:31 +0100 schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis: > > > Am Mittwoch, den 22.12.2004, 16:03 -0500 schrieb seth vidal: > > > > Building ghex for 64bit I get the following error: > > > > > > > > gcc -O2 -g -pipe -m64 -o .libs/ghex2 hex-document-ui.o preferences.o > > > > findreplace.o converter.o config.o main.o ui.o chartable.o session.o > > > > print.o ghex-window.o gnome-print-font-dialog.o gnome-print-font- > > > > picker.o factory.o hex-dialog.o -Wl,--export-dynamic -pthread > > > > -L/usr/X11R6/lib64 -lgnomeui-2 -lSM -lICE -lbonoboui-2 > > > > -lgnome-2 /usr/lib/libpopt.so -lbonobo-2 -lgconf-2 -lgnomevfs-2 > > > > -lbonobo-activation -lORBit-2 -lgthread-2.0 -lgnomeprintui-2-2 > > > > -lgnomeprint-2-2 -lgnomecanvas-2 -lxml2 -lpthread -lz -lart_lgpl_2 > > > > -lpangoft2-1.0 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 > > > > -lm -lpangoxft-1.0 -lpangox-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 > > > > -ldl -lglib-2.0 ./.libs/libgtkhex.so -Wl,--rpath > > > > -Wl,/usr/lib64/usr/lib/libpopt.so: could not read symbols: File in wrong > > > > format > > > > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > > > make[3]: *** [ghex2] Error 1 > > > > make[3]: Leaving directory > > > > `/rpmbuild/extras/cvs/rpms/ghex/devel/ghex-2.8.0/src'make[2]: *** [all- > > > > recursive] Error 1 > > > > make[2]: Leaving directory > > > > `/rpmbuild/extras/cvs/rpms/ghex/devel/ghex-2.8.0' > > > > make[1]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 > > > > make[1]: Leaving directory > > > > `/rpmbuild/extras/cvs/rpms/ghex/devel/ghex-2.8.0' > > > > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.11654 (%build) > > > > > > > Will try to look deeper into it and create a patch on monday that fixed > > > this. I can also update it to 2.8.1 while at it. > > > > Was harder then I thought -- result is here: > > > > http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedorarpms/SRPMS.fdr/ghex-2.8.1-1.src.rpm > > > > Works fine on i386 and x86_64; Diff below; I'm not sure if there is a > > better way to fix but I found none... > > Dag Wieers' ghex 2.8.1 package for x86_64 seems to build without > the need for autoreconf stuff to be added. I looked at it again an found another way to fix it. A simple make %{?_smp_mflags} LIBTOOL=/usr/bin/libtool insted of make %{?_smp_mflags} solves the rpath and the popt.i386 problems also. Is there someone with libtool/autoconf experience reading here? Is that a safe way to fix this problem? BTW: A BuildConflicts: popt.i386 or similar things did also not work. Is it somehow possible to BuildConflict popt.i386, but (indirect trough other BR) BuildRequire popt.x86_64? CU thl P.S.: Two other build fixes for pre-extras-x86_64: ocaml-3.07-5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=143878 imlib2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=143863 Would be nice if someone could comment one those also and/or commit to CVS. Or how am I supposed to bring those fixes in? QA Entry in fedora.us? -- Thorsten Leemhuis From fedora at wir-sind-cool.org Mon Jan 3 18:02:56 2005 From: fedora at wir-sind-cool.org (Michael Schwendt) Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 19:02:56 +0100 Subject: ghex 64bit build errors. In-Reply-To: <1104772671.4317.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1103749426.1007.32.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> <1104003071.2306.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1104161157.4073.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20041227173851.5c1eb547.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> <1104772671.4317.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <20050103190256.7a79e01c.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 18:17:51 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > P.S.: Two other build fixes for pre-extras-x86_64: > > ocaml-3.07-5 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=143878 > > imlib2 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=143863 > > Would be nice if someone could comment one those also and/or commit to > CVS. Or how am I supposed to bring those fixes in? QA Entry in > fedora.us? Well, you are supposed to get CVS access whenever details on that are known. Meanwhile, those with CVS access could commit fixes and updates of course, but it would be nice if package owners explicitly gave their "okay" and/or requested specifically that something gets updated. Initial preparation of CVS contents for FC3 was one thing, maintaining the packages is another thing. The imlib2 maintainer has CVS access already AFAIK. There's another fix for that package needed: imlib2 https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2284 And while the ocaml packager doesn't have CVS access yet, there's an update package which breaks in various ways: ocaml https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1989 -- From fedora at leemhuis.info Mon Jan 3 21:33:43 2005 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 22:33:43 +0100 Subject: ghex 64bit build errors. In-Reply-To: <20050103190256.7a79e01c.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> References: <1103749426.1007.32.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> <1104003071.2306.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1104161157.4073.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20041227173851.5c1eb547.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> <1104772671.4317.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050103190256.7a79e01c.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> Message-ID: <1104788023.2302.18.camel@localhost.localdomain> Am Montag, den 03.01.2005, 19:02 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt: > On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 18:17:51 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > > P.S.: Two other build fixes for pre-extras-x86_64: > > > > ocaml-3.07-5 > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=143878 > > > > imlib2 > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=143863 > > > > Would be nice if someone could comment one those also and/or commit to > > CVS. Or how am I supposed to bring those fixes in? QA Entry in > > fedora.us? > > Well, you are supposed to get CVS access whenever details on that are > known. Sorry, I did not want to rush anyone on the CVS access issue. That was not my intention. I don't have a problem with not having CVS write access. Even if I had commit access I would like to first hear feedback on those patches from either you, Ville,[insert trusted fedora.us packagers here] and/or the package-maintainer before I would apply those patches. > Meanwhile, those with CVS access could commit fixes and updates > of course, but it would be nice if package owners explicitly gave > their "okay" and/or requested specifically that something gets > updated. ++ But IMO it would be nice if we could fix most of the x86_64 issues before we get the "real" extras out. > Initial preparation of CVS contents for FC3 was one thing, > maintaining the packages is another thing. > > The imlib2 maintainer has CVS access already AFAIK. There's another > fix for that package needed: > > imlib2 > https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2284 Ohh, that issue. Yes, I remember. > And while the ocaml packager doesn't have CVS access yet, there's an > update package which breaks in various ways: > > ocaml > https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1989 Quite old bug IMHO... If it takes that long to fix this updated package I would prefer if the current version in CVS could be fixed with the provided patch... But I'll try to look into those bugs, maybe I can help out somehow. Thanks for the info. -- Thorsten Leemhuis From fedora at wir-sind-cool.org Wed Jan 5 16:11:16 2005 From: fedora at wir-sind-cool.org (Michael Schwendt) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:11:16 +0100 Subject: ghex 64bit build errors. In-Reply-To: <1104233076.4118.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1103749426.1007.32.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> <1104003071.2306.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1104161157.4073.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20041227173851.5c1eb547.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> <1104167316.4073.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1104233076.4118.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <20050105171116.48a2d3e3.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 12:24:36 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > But, BTW, dag has: > > BuildRequires: ORBit > BuildRequires: gnome-print-devel >= 0.24 > > From the first sight it seems these needed in out package also, but i > did not look closely. I did look more closely. Both buildrequires are wrong unless you wanted to build for GNOME 1.x or so. And then it would need to be ORBit-devel, not ORBit. So, insufficient build dependencies in either case. In a clean build environment, with the Buildrequires added as specified in his spec file, a rebuild of Dag's src.rpm fails here in the "configure" check. Maybe in his build environment, all GNOME 2.x devel packages are installed. -snip- checking for gtk+-2.0 >= 2.4.0 atk >= 1.0.0... yes checking LIBGTKHEX_CFLAGS... -DXTHREADS -D_REENTRANT -DXUSE_MTSAFE_API -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/freetype2/config -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib/glib-2.0/include checking LIBGTKHEX_LIBS... -Wl,--export-dynamic -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lm -lpangoxft-1.0 -lpangox-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -latk-1.0 -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 checking for gtk+-2.0 >= 2.4.0 libgnomeui-2.0 >= 2.6.0 libgnomeprintui-2.2... Package libgnomeui-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libgnomeui-2.0.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable No package 'libgnomeui-2.0' found configure: error: Library requirements (gtk+-2.0 >= 2.4.0 libgnomeui-2.0 >= 2.6.0 libgnomeprintui-2.2) not met; consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if your libraries are in a nonstandard prefix so pkg-config can find them. error: Bad exit status from /home/qa/tmp/rpm/tmp/rpm-tmp.87315 (%build) RPM build errors: user dag does not exist - using root group dag does not exist - using root Bad exit status from /home/qa/tmp/rpm/tmp/rpm-tmp.87315 (%build) From fedora at wir-sind-cool.org Wed Jan 5 16:39:04 2005 From: fedora at wir-sind-cool.org (Michael Schwendt) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:39:04 +0100 Subject: ghex 64bit build errors. In-Reply-To: <1104772671.4317.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1103749426.1007.32.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> <1104003071.2306.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1104161157.4073.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20041227173851.5c1eb547.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> <1104772671.4317.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: <20050105173904.6d856ff1.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 18:17:51 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > I looked at it again an found another way to fix it. A simple > > make %{?_smp_mflags} LIBTOOL=/usr/bin/libtool > insted of > make %{?_smp_mflags} > > solves the rpath and the popt.i386 problems also. Is there someone with > libtool/autoconf experience reading here? Is that a safe way to fix this > problem? No idea why that would be much different. I would expect /usr/bin/libtool to be not too different from the generated libtool in ghex's build dir. From smooge at gmail.com Wed Jan 5 19:32:26 2005 From: smooge at gmail.com (Stephen J. Smoogen) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:32:26 -0700 Subject: Bundling up alternative packages Message-ID: <80d7e40905010511326f6d32ae@mail.gmail.com> I am working on bundling up a lot of software (SNORT, ACID, BASE, tcptrack, rt/rtir, etc). We are using an alternative version of libpcap worked on by Phil Wood (cpw at lanl.gov) who puts in better statistics and uses an MMAP for better capturing. I was wondering what the best way of packaging up an alternative libpcap would be for extras or if it would be wanted? Also is someone else doing this that I might be stepping on their toes? -- Stephen J Smoogen. CSIRT/Linux System Administrator From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 7 22:01:53 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:01:53 -0500 Subject: new packages Message-ID: <1105135313.22975.13.camel@cutter> pcsc-lite and pcsc-perl were built for x86 and x86_64 as per Ville's Request. Test'em and love'em. :) -sv -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Sat Jan 8 07:30:50 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 02:30:50 -0500 Subject: New Packages Built Message-ID: <1105169450.28377.7.camel@cutter> On Request of Michael Schwendt I built: rkhunter TeXmacs xdesktopwaves xtide xtide would not build on x86_64 - everything else is built for x86 and x86_64. Remember, you can follow new packages built for (pre) extras by reading here: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ -sv -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From fedora at wir-sind-cool.org Sat Jan 8 08:19:42 2005 From: fedora at wir-sind-cool.org (Michael Schwendt) Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 09:19:42 +0100 Subject: Bundling up alternative packages In-Reply-To: <80d7e40905010511326f6d32ae@mail.gmail.com> References: <80d7e40905010511326f6d32ae@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20050108091942.749eb5e9.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:32:26 -0700, Stephen J. Smoogen wrote: > I am working on bundling up a lot of software (SNORT, ACID, BASE, > tcptrack, rt/rtir, etc). We are using an alternative version of > libpcap worked on by Phil Wood (cpw at lanl.gov) who puts in better > statistics and uses an MMAP for better capturing. I was wondering what > the best way of packaging up an alternative libpcap would be for > extras or if it would be wanted? > > Also is someone else doing this that I might be stepping on their toes? Since libpcap is a package in Fedora Core, an "alternative version" would be a replacement for the Core package and hence does not fit into the definition of Fedora Extras. It would fit into the definition of Fedora Alternatives [1] or any similar sub-project which may be opened in the future. -- [1] http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/terminology.html From fedora at wir-sind-cool.org Sat Jan 8 23:10:15 2005 From: fedora at wir-sind-cool.org (Michael Schwendt) Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 00:10:15 +0100 Subject: New Packages Built In-Reply-To: <1105169450.28377.7.camel@cutter> References: <1105169450.28377.7.camel@cutter> Message-ID: <20050109001015.6290333c.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 02:30:50 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > xtide would not build on x86_64 - everything else is built for x86 and > x86_64. Please cvs up and build for x86_64 once more. From smooge at gmail.com Sun Jan 9 01:30:57 2005 From: smooge at gmail.com (Stephen J. Smoogen) Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 18:30:57 -0700 Subject: Bundling up alternative packages In-Reply-To: <20050108091942.749eb5e9.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> References: <80d7e40905010511326f6d32ae@mail.gmail.com> <20050108091942.749eb5e9.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> Message-ID: <80d7e4090501081730404f6681@mail.gmail.com> On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 09:19:42 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:32:26 -0700, Stephen J. Smoogen wrote: > > > I am working on bundling up a lot of software (SNORT, ACID, BASE, > > tcptrack, rt/rtir, etc). We are using an alternative version of > > libpcap worked on by Phil Wood (cpw at lanl.gov) who puts in better > > statistics and uses an MMAP for better capturing. I was wondering what > > the best way of packaging up an alternative libpcap would be for > > extras or if it would be wanted? > > > > Also is someone else doing this that I might be stepping on their toes? > > Since libpcap is a package in Fedora Core, an "alternative version" > would be a replacement for the Core package and hence does not fit > into the definition of Fedora Extras. It would fit into the definition > of Fedora Alternatives [1] or any similar sub-project which may be > opened in the future. > Ok thanks for the info. From that I should make the SNORT and other tools compiled against the normal pcap if they should be in extras. -- Stephen J Smoogen. CSIRT/Linux System Administrator From wtogami at redhat.com Sun Jan 9 12:55:52 2005 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 02:55:52 -1000 Subject: Bundling up alternative packages In-Reply-To: <80d7e4090501081730404f6681@mail.gmail.com> References: <80d7e40905010511326f6d32ae@mail.gmail.com> <20050108091942.749eb5e9.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> <80d7e4090501081730404f6681@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <41E129D8.60906@redhat.com> Stephen J. Smoogen wrote: >> >>Since libpcap is a package in Fedora Core, an "alternative version" >>would be a replacement for the Core package and hence does not fit >>into the definition of Fedora Extras. It would fit into the definition >>of Fedora Alternatives [1] or any similar sub-project which may be >>opened in the future. >> > > > Ok thanks for the info. From that I should make the SNORT and other > tools compiled against the normal pcap if they should be in extras. > > Would that be a static link? Just checking, because multiple packages typically need to be updated every time there is a libpcap security issue. =( Warren From smooge at gmail.com Mon Jan 10 00:32:32 2005 From: smooge at gmail.com (Stephen J. Smoogen) Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 17:32:32 -0700 Subject: Bundling up alternative packages In-Reply-To: <41E129D8.60906@redhat.com> References: <80d7e40905010511326f6d32ae@mail.gmail.com> <20050108091942.749eb5e9.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> <80d7e4090501081730404f6681@mail.gmail.com> <41E129D8.60906@redhat.com> Message-ID: <80d7e409050109163224fc854a@mail.gmail.com> On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 02:55:52 -1000, Warren Togami wrote: > Stephen J. Smoogen wrote: > >> > >>Since libpcap is a package in Fedora Core, an "alternative version" > >>would be a replacement for the Core package and hence does not fit > >>into the definition of Fedora Extras. It would fit into the definition > >>of Fedora Alternatives [1] or any similar sub-project which may be > >>opened in the future. > > Ok thanks for the info. From that I should make the SNORT and other > > tools compiled against the normal pcap if they should be in extras. > Would that be a static link? Just checking, because multiple packages > typically need to be updated every time there is a libpcap security > issue. =( > The Phil Woods pcap is supposed to be a dropin replacement and we have been doing it here for some time without known issues. My current thinking of bundling it would be to compile SNORT, etc with regular libpcap, and confirm afterwords that Phils does not need special stuff. I also would hopefully compile those apps with standard links versus static compiles. That way we do not have to worry too much about the update from hell. > Warren > -- Stephen J Smoogen. CSIRT/Linux System Administrator From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Mon Jan 10 07:12:57 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 02:12:57 -0500 Subject: New Packages in (Pre) Extras Message-ID: <1105341177.13024.43.camel@cutter> New packages built: On the request of Phillip Compton and Ville Skytt? I've built: zope Perl-IO-Socket-SSL lcms scribus Everything is built for X86 and X86_64, except for scribus which did not build for x86_64. As before - information on these updates can be seen at: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ -sv -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From bart.vanbrabant at zoeloelip.be Mon Jan 10 19:05:59 2005 From: bart.vanbrabant at zoeloelip.be (Bart Vanbrabant) Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 20:05:59 +0100 Subject: mmcache -> eaccelerator Message-ID: <41E2D217.4000408@zoeloelip.be> Hello, php-mmcache is in fedora-extras now but it isn't maintained any more. A new project eAccelerator, has forked mmcache and applied the patches that existed. These patches handle the segfaults and make it php5 compatible. We are now at 0.9.2a, 0.9.0 is the same the latest php-mmcache release. Php-mmcache can be used for FC3 but it can't be used in FC4 because it will use php5. I've packaged rpms for php-4.3.10 and php-5 from rawhide. You can find the source rpms here [1] and here [2]. The project page is [3]. More information on the rpms the spec file produces can be found here [4]. [1] http://www.student.kuleuven.ac.be/~s0110641/RPMS/php-eaccelerator/php-eaccelerator-4.3.10_0.9.2-6.src.rpm [2] http://www.student.kuleuven.ac.be/~s0110641/RPMS/php5/php-eaccelerator-5.0.2_0.9.2-8.src.rpm [3] http://eaccelerator.sourceforge.net/HomeUk [4] http://eaccelerator.sourceforge.net/BinaryInstallationUk Bart -- Bart Vanbrabant PGP fingerprint: 093C BB84 17F6 3AA6 6D5E FC4F 84E1 FED1 E426 64D1 -- Bart Vanbrabant PGP fingerprint: 093C BB84 17F6 3AA6 6D5E FC4F 84E1 FED1 E426 64D1 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 256 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Mon Jan 10 21:03:14 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:03:14 -0500 Subject: updated packages. Message-ID: <1105390994.16205.4.camel@cutter> xtide and ghex - as requested by michael schwendt -sv -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 11 02:15:45 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:15:45 -0500 Subject: xv-docs shouldn't be in Fedora Extras 3? In-Reply-To: <20050111011346.GI5001@angus.ind.WPI.EDU> References: <20050111011346.GI5001@angus.ind.WPI.EDU> Message-ID: <1105409745.17903.0.camel@cutter> On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 20:13 -0500, Charles R. Anderson wrote: > Fedora PreExtras 3 has an xv-docs package available, with no > corresponding xv package (required by xv-docs). I find no component > in Fedora Extras 3 bugzilla to file a bug on this... > > Maybe a "distribution" component should be added to bugzilla, like > there is for Core? 1. this is best addressed on the fedora-extras-list 2. xv-docs should be removed too, xv and xv-docs are not legally acceptable for extras. I'll clean up xv-docs, too, thanks. -sv -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From fedora at wir-sind-cool.org Tue Jan 11 03:15:26 2005 From: fedora at wir-sind-cool.org (Michael Schwendt) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 04:15:26 +0100 Subject: xv-docs shouldn't be in Fedora Extras 3? In-Reply-To: <1105409745.17903.0.camel@cutter> References: <20050111011346.GI5001@angus.ind.WPI.EDU> <1105409745.17903.0.camel@cutter> Message-ID: <20050111041526.680294f8.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 21:15:45 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > On Mon, 2005-01-10 at 20:13 -0500, Charles R. Anderson wrote: > > Fedora PreExtras 3 has an xv-docs package available, with no > > corresponding xv package (required by xv-docs). I find no component > > in Fedora Extras 3 bugzilla to file a bug on this... > > > > Maybe a "distribution" component should be added to bugzilla, like > > there is for Core? Meanwhile there's the "general" component. From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Thu Jan 13 05:17:17 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 00:17:17 -0500 Subject: New Extras Packages Message-ID: <1105593437.30824.49.camel@cutter> Phillip Compton and Michael Schwendt asked me to build some new packages that they checked in: bluefish libkexif libkipi liferea All built and ready to go. Follow updates and new packages at: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ Report problems at Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ Thanks, -sv -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From steve at silug.org Thu Jan 13 12:54:22 2005 From: steve at silug.org (Steven Pritchard) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 06:54:22 -0600 Subject: request: supertux update Message-ID: <20050113125422.GA28156@osiris.silug.org> Could somebody with CVS access update supertux? https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=2208 (Reviewed, updated package there.) Steve -- Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc. Email: steve at kspei.com http://www.kspei.com/ Phone: (618)398-3000 Mobile: (618)567-7320 From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Thu Jan 13 13:44:54 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:44:54 -0500 Subject: New Extras Packages Message-ID: <1105623894.32603.17.camel@cutter> Hi, Warren asked for some packages to be built that he's vetted. These are up and online pop-before-smtp: x86, x86_64 vpnc: x86_64 Follow updates and new packages at: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ Report problems at Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ Thanks, -sv -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Thu Jan 13 19:55:28 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:55:28 -0500 Subject: New Extras Packages Message-ID: <1105646128.1597.7.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> New Packages in Extras: gl-117 kile kile-i18n psi qca supertux Michael Schwendt was nice enough to make all of these work. Follow updates and new packages at: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ Report problems at Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ Thanks, -sv From fedora at wir-sind-cool.org Thu Jan 13 20:29:32 2005 From: fedora at wir-sind-cool.org (Michael Schwendt) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 21:29:32 +0100 Subject: New Extras Packages In-Reply-To: <1105646128.1597.7.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> References: <1105646128.1597.7.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> Message-ID: <20050113212932.4a6a5945.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:55:28 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > New Packages in Extras: > > gl-117 > kile > kile-i18n > psi > qca > supertux > > Michael Schwendt was nice enough to make all of these work. Credits go to the packagers. From thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net Thu Jan 13 20:44:56 2005 From: thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net (Matthias Saou) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 21:44:56 +0100 Subject: New Extras Packages In-Reply-To: <1105646128.1597.7.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> References: <1105646128.1597.7.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> Message-ID: <20050113214456.107512c8@python2> seth vidal wrote : > New Packages in Extras: [...] Could you maybe trigger rebuild for the following too? torcs torcs-data rrdtool python-twisted php-mmcache php-pecl-mailparse php-pecl-sqlite xmms-lirc ucarp hercules kannel advancecomp epydoc synergy Some have been updated, but most just for the release tag cleaned up. Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) - Linux kernel 2.6.10-1.737_FC3 Load : 0.12 0.56 0.52 From skvidal at phy.duke.edu Thu Jan 13 21:15:54 2005 From: skvidal at phy.duke.edu (seth vidal) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:15:54 -0500 Subject: New Extras Packages In-Reply-To: <20050113214456.107512c8@python2> References: <1105646128.1597.7.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> <20050113214456.107512c8@python2> Message-ID: <1105650954.1597.20.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 21:44 +0100, Matthias Saou wrote: > seth vidal wrote : > > > New Packages in Extras: > [...] > > Could you maybe trigger rebuild for the following too? > > torcs not so happy on building. Errors are: > kannel Needs sqlite-devel which isn't available in extras. Can you merge that one in? The rest built and will be pushed soon. -sv From skvidal at phy.duke.edu Thu Jan 13 21:26:29 2005 From: skvidal at phy.duke.edu (seth vidal) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:26:29 -0500 Subject: New Extras Packages In-Reply-To: <1105650954.1597.20.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> References: <1105646128.1597.7.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> <20050113214456.107512c8@python2> <1105650954.1597.20.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> Message-ID: <1105651589.1597.23.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 16:15 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 21:44 +0100, Matthias Saou wrote: > > seth vidal wrote : > > > > > New Packages in Extras: > > [...] > > > > Could you maybe trigger rebuild for the following too? > > > > torcs > > not so happy on building for x86_64: Torcs on x86_64 won't build: /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libz.so when searching for -lz /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libz.a when searching for -lz /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libdl.so when searching for -ldl /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libdl.a when searching for -ldl File logs/torcs.log not changed so no update needed. [build at extras64 extras]$ tail -30 logs/torcs.log make[5]: Entering directory `/rpmbuild/extras/cvs/rpms/torcs/devel/torcs-1.2.2/src/tools/package' make[5]: Nothing to be done for `tools'. make[5]: Leaving directory `/rpmbuild/extras/cvs/rpms/torcs/devel/torcs-1.2.2/src/tools/package' make[5]: Entering directory `/rpmbuild/extras/cvs/rpms/torcs/devel/torcs-1.2.2/src/tools/texmapper' make[5]: Nothing to be done for `tools'. make[5]: Leaving directory `/rpmbuild/extras/cvs/rpms/torcs/devel/torcs-1.2.2/src/tools/texmapper' make[5]: Entering directory `/rpmbuild/extras/cvs/rpms/torcs/devel/torcs-1.2.2/src/tools/trackgen' make[5]: Nothing to be done for `tools'. make[5]: Leaving directory `/rpmbuild/extras/cvs/rpms/torcs/devel/torcs-1.2.2/src/tools/trackgen' make[4]: Leaving directory `/rpmbuild/extras/cvs/rpms/torcs/devel/torcs-1.2.2/src/tools' make[4]: Entering directory `/rpmbuild/extras/cvs/rpms/torcs/devel/torcs-1.2.2/src/linux' make[4]: Nothing to be done for `tools'. make[4]: Leaving directory `/rpmbuild/extras/cvs/rpms/torcs/devel/torcs-1.2.2/src/linux' make[3]: Leaving directory `/rpmbuild/extras/cvs/rpms/torcs/devel/torcs-1.2.2/src' make[5]: *** [.depend] Error 1 make[5]: Leaving directory `/rpmbuild/extras/cvs/rpms/torcs/devel/torcs-1.2.2/src/libs/confscreens' make[4]: *** [subdirs] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory `/rpmbuild/extras/cvs/rpms/torcs/devel/torcs-1.2.2/src/libs' make[3]: *** [subdirs] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/rpmbuild/extras/cvs/rpms/torcs/devel/torcs-1.2.2/src' make[2]: *** [subdirs] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/rpmbuild/extras/cvs/rpms/torcs/devel/torcs-1.2.2' make[1]: *** [restart] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/rpmbuild/extras/cvs/rpms/torcs/devel/torcs-1.2.2' error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.7969 (%build) -sv From thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net Thu Jan 13 21:31:52 2005 From: thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net (Matthias Saou) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:31:52 +0100 Subject: New Extras Packages In-Reply-To: <1105650954.1597.20.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> References: <1105646128.1597.7.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> <20050113214456.107512c8@python2> <1105650954.1597.20.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> Message-ID: <20050113223152.484ba3c5@python2> seth vidal wrote : > > kannel > > Needs sqlite-devel which isn't available in extras. Can you merge that > one in? Strange, I can see an antique sqlite.spec file in the CVS's devel branch. Anyway, I just remembered that this latest kannel version doesn't build on FC3 because of a bogus first line of a .dep file created by the make process... I'll have to dig for that one, especially since it builds fine on anything < FC3. > The rest built and will be pushed soon. Great, thanks. Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) - Linux kernel 2.6.10-1.737_FC3 Load : 1.00 0.68 0.34 From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Thu Jan 13 21:39:39 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:39:39 -0500 Subject: New Packages for Extras Message-ID: <1105652379.1597.28.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> New Packages for Extras: >From Ville: perl-Test-Pod-Coverage >From Matthias: advancecomp epydoc php-mmcache php-pecl-mailparse php-pecl-sqlite python-twisted rrdtool synergy torcs - i386 only right now torcs-data ucarp xmms-lirc Follow updates and new packages at: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ Report problems at Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ -sv From fedora at wir-sind-cool.org Thu Jan 13 21:44:51 2005 From: fedora at wir-sind-cool.org (Michael Schwendt) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:44:51 +0100 Subject: New Extras Packages In-Reply-To: <1105650954.1597.20.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> References: <1105646128.1597.7.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> <20050113214456.107512c8@python2> <1105650954.1597.20.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> Message-ID: <20050113224451.75dbe2ad.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:15:54 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > kannel > > Needs sqlite-devel which isn't available in extras. Can you merge that > one in? sqlite-devel-2.8.6-6.i386.rpm is in extras. An update spotted somewhere in the queue. Don't know from the top of my head why/whether it is held up. From fedora at wir-sind-cool.org Thu Jan 13 21:51:26 2005 From: fedora at wir-sind-cool.org (Michael Schwendt) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:51:26 +0100 Subject: New Extras Packages In-Reply-To: <20050113223152.484ba3c5@python2> References: <1105646128.1597.7.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> <20050113214456.107512c8@python2> <1105650954.1597.20.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> <20050113223152.484ba3c5@python2> Message-ID: <20050113225126.360a9008.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:31:52 +0100, Matthias Saou wrote: > seth vidal wrote : > > > > kannel > > > > Needs sqlite-devel which isn't available in extras. Can you merge that > > one in? > > Strange, I can see an antique sqlite.spec file in the CVS's devel branch. https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1766 Go figure. No idea where Nils is. Sooner or later a list of orphaned packages will be needed, so they can be taken over by somebody else. From skvidal at phy.duke.edu Thu Jan 13 21:57:51 2005 From: skvidal at phy.duke.edu (seth vidal) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 16:57:51 -0500 Subject: New Extras Packages In-Reply-To: <20050113225126.360a9008.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> References: <1105646128.1597.7.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> <20050113214456.107512c8@python2> <1105650954.1597.20.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> <20050113223152.484ba3c5@python2> <20050113225126.360a9008.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> Message-ID: <1105653472.1597.42.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 22:51 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 22:31:52 +0100, Matthias Saou wrote: > > > seth vidal wrote : > > > > > > kannel > > > > > > Needs sqlite-devel which isn't available in extras. Can you merge that > > > one in? > > > > Strange, I can see an antique sqlite.spec file in the CVS's devel branch. > > https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=1766 > > Go figure. No idea where Nils is. Sooner or later a list of orphaned > packages will be needed, so they can be taken over by somebody else. > Right sqlite i386 is built - old version, though.. sqlite x86_64 is not. I've got build errors for sqlite x86_64 if someone wants to take over the pkg. -sv From ville.skytta at iki.fi Thu Jan 13 22:58:38 2005 From: ville.skytta at iki.fi (Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Skytt=E4?=) Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:58:38 +0200 Subject: New Extras Packages In-Reply-To: <20050113223152.484ba3c5@python2> References: <1105646128.1597.7.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> <20050113214456.107512c8@python2> <1105650954.1597.20.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> <20050113223152.484ba3c5@python2> Message-ID: <1105657118.524.25.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> On Thu, 2005-01-13 at 22:31 +0100, Matthias Saou wrote: > Anyway, I just remembered that this latest kannel version doesn't build on > FC3 because of a bogus first line of a .dep file created by the make > process... I'll have to dig for that one, especially since it builds fine > on anything < FC3. Maybe a gcc 3.4 thing? I added a butt-ugly kludge to work around a problem like this to the uqm package some time ago. See uqm- gcc34MM.patch in CVS. And be sure to let me know if the kannel problem is related and you find a Real Fix for it... From wtogami at redhat.com Fri Jan 14 00:28:16 2005 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:28:16 -1000 Subject: New Packages for Extras In-Reply-To: <1105652379.1597.28.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> References: <1105652379.1597.28.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> Message-ID: <41E71220.3030606@redhat.com> seth vidal wrote: > php-mmcache I recall reading somewhere that this is a dead project, and there is a forked active project of a different name somewhere? Anyone know what the story is here? Warren From fedora at wir-sind-cool.org Fri Jan 14 07:18:44 2005 From: fedora at wir-sind-cool.org (Michael Schwendt) Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 08:18:44 +0100 Subject: php-mmcache (was: Re: New Packages for Extras) In-Reply-To: <41E71220.3030606@redhat.com> References: <1105652379.1597.28.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> <41E71220.3030606@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20050114081844.59d144a2.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:28:16 -1000, Warren Togami wrote: > seth vidal wrote: > > php-mmcache > > I recall reading somewhere that this is a dead project, and there is a > forked active project of a different name somewhere? Anyone know what > the story is here? Probably you read this from four days ago? https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-January/msg00017.html From thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net Fri Jan 14 09:43:11 2005 From: thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net (Matthias Saou) Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:43:11 +0100 Subject: New Packages for Extras In-Reply-To: <41E71220.3030606@redhat.com> References: <1105652379.1597.28.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> <41E71220.3030606@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20050114104311.593237fe@python2> Warren Togami wrote : > seth vidal wrote: > > php-mmcache > > I recall reading somewhere that this is a dead project, and there is a > forked active project of a different name somewhere? Anyone know what > the story is here? Yes. To make it short, Zend hired the author, probably because his great little piece of software was making too much "harm" to their Performance Suite software... but the wonders of free software licensing, and some people still interested in the project made the rest : eaccelerator. I've already got packages for that one, as it is _very_ similar to mmcache, I guess I could just go ahead and import it? Sounds ok? Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) - Linux kernel 2.6.10-1.737_FC3 Load : 0.35 0.39 0.23 From thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net Fri Jan 14 10:08:55 2005 From: thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net (Matthias Saou) Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:08:55 +0100 Subject: Possible new imports Message-ID: <20050114110855.4e375489@python2> Hi, Here are some "new" packages I already have and would like to import into Extras. Maybe some were already the centrer of ongoing fedora.us bugs, so I'm posting here before just in case : php-eaccelerator (this one is picking up where php-mmcache left off) SDL_gfx (required by my latest perl-SDL package) Gtk-Perl (old RH package still required by frozen-bubble) liboil (library required by newest versions of swfdec) perl-libintl (perl module for i18n required by dvd::rip) AFAICS, no legal blur, no major conflicts... all pretty simple. Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) - Linux kernel 2.6.10-1.737_FC3 Load : 0.24 0.29 0.32 From wtogami at redhat.com Fri Jan 14 10:23:42 2005 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:23:42 -1000 Subject: Possible new imports In-Reply-To: <20050114110855.4e375489@python2> References: <20050114110855.4e375489@python2> Message-ID: <41E79DAE.4030505@redhat.com> Matthias Saou wrote: > liboil > (library required by newest versions of swfdec) > Do we have any way of packaging swfdec (browser plugin right?) so that either it or flash-plugin can be installed, but not at the same time? Warren From wtogami at redhat.com Fri Jan 14 10:25:46 2005 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:25:46 -1000 Subject: New Packages for Extras In-Reply-To: <20050114104311.593237fe@python2> References: <1105652379.1597.28.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> <41E71220.3030606@redhat.com> <20050114104311.593237fe@python2> Message-ID: <41E79E2A.1060905@redhat.com> Matthias Saou wrote: > Warren Togami wrote : > > >>seth vidal wrote: >> >>> php-mmcache >> >>I recall reading somewhere that this is a dead project, and there is a >>forked active project of a different name somewhere? Anyone know what >>the story is here? > > > Yes. To make it short, Zend hired the author, probably because his great > little piece of software was making too much "harm" to their Performance > Suite software... but the wonders of free software licensing, and some > people still interested in the project made the rest : eaccelerator. > > I've already got packages for that one, as it is _very_ similar to mmcache, > I guess I could just go ahead and import it? Sounds ok? > Sounds OK, but perhaps we should have the other guy become involved with maintenance of that package in Extras? Maybe work with him in future maintenance? I am a bit concerned about the burden of the large number of packages under your sole maintainership. =) Would php-mmcache be Obsoleted and removed then? Warren Togami wtogami at redhat.com From thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net Fri Jan 14 10:50:34 2005 From: thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net (Matthias Saou) Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:50:34 +0100 Subject: New Packages for Extras In-Reply-To: <41E79E2A.1060905@redhat.com> References: <1105652379.1597.28.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> <41E71220.3030606@redhat.com> <20050114104311.593237fe@python2> <41E79E2A.1060905@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20050114115034.300e5437@python2> Warren Togami wrote : [... php-eaccelerator package ...] > > Sounds OK, but perhaps we should have the other guy become involved with > maintenance of that package in Extras? Maybe work with him in future > maintenance? "The other guy"? If you're talking about the person who reported the change and asked to get php-eaccelerator packaged, well, he also contacted me in private asking if I'd consider packaging it on freshrpms.net too. His spec file is based on my php-mmcache one, with very recent SuSE-compatibility defacing he accepted from someone else, that we most certainly don't want. I think he became the "rpm packager" for their project "by default" more than anything else (not that I mean anything negative by that, and it's just my impression). > I am a bit concerned about the burden of the large number > of packages under your sole maintainership. =) ...but that's not counting all of those packages that I'd like to reclaim maintainership of! ;-) > Would php-mmcache be Obsoleted and removed then? Why not. But there is no reason to kick it out immediately, but surely in the not-so-distant future since mmcache isn't PHP5 compatible, whereas eaccelerator is. Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) - Linux kernel 2.6.10-1.737_FC3 Load : 0.03 0.17 0.29 From bart.vanbrabant at zoeloelip.be Fri Jan 14 13:30:53 2005 From: bart.vanbrabant at zoeloelip.be (Bart Vanbrabant) Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:30:53 +0100 Subject: New Packages for Extras In-Reply-To: <20050114115034.300e5437@python2> References: <1105652379.1597.28.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> <41E71220.3030606@redhat.com> <20050114104311.593237fe@python2> <41E79E2A.1060905@redhat.com> <20050114115034.300e5437@python2> Message-ID: <41E7C98D.9050701@zoeloelip.be> Matthias Saou wrote: >Warren Togami wrote : > >[... php-eaccelerator package ...] > > >>Sounds OK, but perhaps we should have the other guy become involved with >>maintenance of that package in Extras? Maybe work with him in future >>maintenance? >> >> > >"The other guy"? If you're talking about the person who reported the change >and asked to get php-eaccelerator packaged, well, he also contacted me in >private asking if I'd consider packaging it on freshrpms.net too. His spec >file is based on my php-mmcache one, with very recent SuSE-compatibility >defacing he accepted from someone else, that we most certainly don't want. >I think he became the "rpm packager" for their project "by default" more >than anything else (not that I mean anything negative by that, and it's >just my impression). > > > I'm that guy. I would be nice to see eAccelerator included in fedora extras. I builded those packages for me to test eAccelerator, I contributed them to the project and I'm the person who helps them with building packages and things like that. I don't have much experience in these things. I would like to help out with this package if it's neccesary but it's not that I would like to maintain this. Matthias has done this before for mmcache and the project hasn't changed much. The next release would be round the 10th of february. >>I am a bit concerned about the burden of the large number >>of packages under your sole maintainership. =) >> >> > >...but that's not counting all of those packages that I'd like to reclaim >maintainership of! ;-) > > > >>Would php-mmcache be Obsoleted and removed then? >> >> > >Why not. But there is no reason to kick it out immediately, but surely in >the not-so-distant future since mmcache isn't PHP5 compatible, whereas >eaccelerator is. > > > Mandrake has removed mmcache from cooker and eaccelerator will be in 10.2 . Thanks for including it, Bart -- Bart Vanbrabant PGP fingerprint: 093C BB84 17F6 3AA6 6D5E FC4F 84E1 FED1 E426 64D1 From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 14 17:03:16 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:03:16 -0500 Subject: New Extras Packages Message-ID: <1105722196.3944.30.camel@cutter> Hi, New packages pushed for Extras: proj shapelib netcdf These are all built for x86 and x86_64. Follow updates and new packages at: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ Report problems at Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ -sv -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From wtogami at redhat.com Sun Jan 16 03:23:43 2005 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 17:23:43 -1000 Subject: FC3 Pre-Extras for apt Users Message-ID: <41E9DE3F.3070502@redhat.com> /etc/apt/sources.list: rpm http://download.fedora.us/fedora fedora/3/i386 extras Hawaii, USA Mirror rpm http://download.fr.fedora.us/fedora fedora/3/i386 extras France Mirror Pre-Extras currently hosted at http://fedoraproject.org/pre-extras/ is yum metadata only, so I have replicated those packages into the download.fedora.us repository for the convenience of apt users. yum repodata users should continue using http://fedoraproject.org/pre-extras/ instead. http://fedoraproject.org/pre-extras/RPM-GPG-KEY-Fedora-Pre-Extras Import this GPG key for pre-extras packages. download.fedora.us will continue to exist primarily to support apt users of older distributions who depend on the fedora.us Extras. RPMS.updates continues to import updates from download.fedora.redhat.com or the Fedora Legacy project. download.fedora.redhat.com will soon push the official Extras tree. When that happens, RPMS.extras will be populated from that tree instead. Warren Togami wtogami at redhat.com From ville.skytta at iki.fi Sun Jan 16 08:24:37 2005 From: ville.skytta at iki.fi (Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Skytt=E4?=) Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 10:24:37 +0200 Subject: FC3 Pre-Extras for apt Users In-Reply-To: <41E9DE3F.3070502@redhat.com> References: <41E9DE3F.3070502@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1105863877.26315.3.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 17:23 -1000, Warren Togami wrote: > Pre-Extras currently hosted at http://fedoraproject.org/pre-extras/ is > yum metadata only, so I have replicated those packages into the > download.fedora.us repository for the convenience of apt users. Thank you! From fedora at wir-sind-cool.org Sun Jan 16 16:04:48 2005 From: fedora at wir-sind-cool.org (Michael Schwendt) Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 17:04:48 +0100 Subject: Extras package submissions and general thoughts Message-ID: <20050116170448.6f174fa2.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> Hi everyone, in particular those involved at fedora.us and pre-Extras! While Fedora Extras is still being prepared, here are some thoughts which accumulated over the past few days: PACKAGE SUBMISSIONS The official package submission policies and workflow for Fedora Extras are not known yet. Those who have submitted new packages at bugzilla.redhat.com instead of bugzilla.fedora.us are too early. At fedora.us we've had at least a documented procedure. In bugzilla at redhat.com we don't. But as some form of guidance, please do not ignore existing fedora.us documents completely. There's a good bit of information included with regard to package QA and packaging hints. PACKAGE REQUESTS Every package in Fedora Extras needs at least one maintainer (read: package owner). It is beyond the existing project resources to pick up arbitrary packages found on web sites. If you have a wish list of what ought to be included, discuss this on fedora-extras-list please and maybe somebody steps up as the package maintainer. Naturally, those fine people who support upstream projects with Fedora Core specific packages, are likely the candidates who would also like to maintain a package in Fedora Extras. UNMOTIVATED PACKAGERS It is a pain trying to support new contributors and their package submissions, when someone doesn't reply to feedback or seems to drop off after a first submission. If you decide to stay away or not maintain your included package anymore, please be so fair and inform the project members and the community, so an unmaintained package can be removed or taken over by somebody else. Included packages at some point of time had been reviewed and approved. It would be a pitty to lose them. Whether due to impatience, whether due to disappointment of Fedora Extras progress, whether due to intricate procedures and workflow management, please only join and submit packages or contributions if you are serious about supporting the project, even during somewhat difficult times. It should be clear that with limited infrastructure (such as type of build system and access to it, bugzilla upload procedures instead of direct CVS access), it would be necessary to bridge the period of time till Fedora Extras provides superior infrastructure. EXISTING PACKAGE SUBMISSIONS, http://fedora.us/QA With regard to the many packages in the queue, there has been no slavedriver at fedora.us who forces contributors to review arbitrary packages. At fedora.us we're all volunteers. But the package submission policies recommend that in order to gain experience and trust, packagers should exchange reviews with eachother. Where that doesn't happen and where nobody reviews a package, no progress is made. PACKAGE UPDATES, Fedora pre-Extras Since only a handful of project contributors outside Red Hat have write access to the Fedora Extras CVS till official ways for getting access are announced, it would be necessary that existing package owners approach one of these when they want to commit updates. You should be able to do that via bugzilla Cc or private mail. If I'm informed correctly, the six people (and their bugzilla e-mail addresses) are: Damien Nade Phillip Compton Matthias Saou Michael Schwendt Ville Skytt? Thomas Vander Stichele The list of current package owners can be displayed in bugzilla. PACKAGE UPGRADES, Fedora pre-Extras Where version upgrades are requested or suggested by users, we need to find new ways of doing QA. For instance, library upgrades affect all existing dependencies, and these are not always maintained by the same person. If not in bugzilla, communication channels outside bugzilla (e.g. on fedora-extras-list) need to be established. Michael -- Fedora Core release 2 (Tettnang) - Linux 2.6.10-1.9_FC2 loadavg: 0.38 0.98 0.95 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Sun Jan 16 17:21:37 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 12:21:37 -0500 Subject: New Packages in Extras Message-ID: <1105896097.3725.19.camel@cutter> Hi, 3 new packages available for your listening pleasure: abcde cd-discid convmv Built for both x86 and x86_64 with painstaking skill and workmanship. :) Follow updates and new packages at: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ Report problems at Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ -sv -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Sun Jan 16 17:48:59 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 12:48:59 -0500 Subject: Still more New Packages Message-ID: <1105897739.3725.22.camel@cutter> Additional Packages: bittorrent: x86, x86_64 grisbi: x86, x86_64 lft: x86, x86_64 python-sqlite: x86 x86_64 build, error logs available: http://linux.duke.edu/~skvidal/misc/extras/logs/sqlite.x86_64.log Follow updates and new packages at: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ Report problems at Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ -sv -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 18 06:04:16 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 01:04:16 -0500 Subject: new/updated packages for extras Message-ID: <1106028256.3725.171.camel@cutter> At the request of Ville I've built: apt - i386 only bash-completion - i386, x86_64 fedora-rpmdevtools - i386, x86_64 perl-Chart - i386, x86_64 perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder - i386, x86_64 perl-GDGraph3d - i386, x86_64 Follow updates and new packages at: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ Report problems at Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ -sv -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From alexl at users.sourceforge.net Tue Jan 18 11:13:02 2005 From: alexl at users.sourceforge.net (Alex Lancaster) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 03:13:02 -0800 Subject: Synaptic needs to rebuilt against new apt on pre-extras Message-ID: <7qacr7dm81.fsf@allele2.biol.berkeley.edu> I just used the new pre-extras apt mirror at download.fedora.us to do an upgrade and for some reason when it upgraded apt, it wanted to removed synaptic! $ apt-get install -s apt Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following packages will be upgraded apt (0.5.15cnc6-11 => 0.5.15cnc6-12.r362) The following packages will be REMOVED: synaptic (0:0.51-1) 1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 removed and 3 not upgraded. Remv synaptic (0:0.51-1 Fedora Extras:3/stable) Inst apt [0:0.5.15cnc6-11] (0:0.5.15cnc6-12.r362 Fedora Extras:3/stable) Conf apt (0:0.5.15cnc6-12.r362 Fedora Extras:3/stable) There was no explicit conflicts or obsoletes for apt: $ rpm -q --conflicts --obsoletes apt (none)(none) So after upgrading apt (and removing synaptic), I tried re-installing synaptic and it appears that synaptic needs to be rebuilt against the new apt: $ apt-get install synaptic Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. Since you only requested a single operation it is extremely likely that the package is simply not installable and a bug report against that package should be filed. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: synaptic: Depends: libapt-pkg-libc6.3-6.so.0 E: Broken packages Alex From pmatilai at welho.com Tue Jan 18 11:20:30 2005 From: pmatilai at welho.com (Panu Matilainen) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:20:30 +0200 (EET) Subject: Synaptic needs to rebuilt against new apt on pre-extras In-Reply-To: <7qacr7dm81.fsf@allele2.biol.berkeley.edu> References: <7qacr7dm81.fsf@allele2.biol.berkeley.edu> Message-ID: On Tue, 18 Jan 2005, Alex Lancaster wrote: > I just used the new pre-extras apt mirror at download.fedora.us to do > an upgrade and for some reason when it upgraded apt, it wanted to > removed synaptic! ... > So after upgrading apt (and removing synaptic), I tried re-installing > synaptic and it appears that synaptic needs to be rebuilt against the > new apt: Oh, indeed. Seth: don't bother rebuilding the rather ancient version of Synaptic currently in pre-extras, somebody with CVS commit access should import a current version of it to CVS (I think Ville is about to do this but the sooner the better...): http://fedora.laiskiainen.org/SRPMS.extras/synaptic-0.55.3-1.src.rpm - Panu - From alexl at users.sourceforge.net Tue Jan 18 11:21:12 2005 From: alexl at users.sourceforge.net (Alex Lancaster) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 03:21:12 -0800 Subject: Synaptic needs to rebuilt against new apt on pre-extras In-Reply-To: <7qacr7dm81.fsf@allele2.biol.berkeley.edu> (Alex Lancaster's message of "Tue, 18 Jan 2005 03:13:02 -0800") References: <7qacr7dm81.fsf@allele2.biol.berkeley.edu> Message-ID: >>>>> "AL" == Alex Lancaster writes: AL> I just used the new pre-extras apt mirror at download.fedora.us to AL> do an upgrade and for some reason when it upgraded apt, it wanted AL> to removed synaptic! I made a bugzilla report: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/beta/show_bug.cgi?id=145427 Alex From alexl at users.sourceforge.net Tue Jan 18 13:32:25 2005 From: alexl at users.sourceforge.net (Alex Lancaster) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 05:32:25 -0800 Subject: Synaptic needs to rebuilt against new apt on pre-extras In-Reply-To: (Panu Matilainen's message of "Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:20:30 +0200 (EET)") References: <7qacr7dm81.fsf@allele2.biol.berkeley.edu> Message-ID: >>>>> "PM" == Panu Matilainen writes: >> So after upgrading apt (and removing synaptic), I tried >> re-installing synaptic and it appears that synaptic needs to be >> rebuilt against the new apt: PM> Oh, indeed. Seth: don't bother rebuilding the rather ancient PM> version of Synaptic currently in pre-extras, somebody with CVS PM> commit access should import a current version of it to CVS (I PM> think Ville is about to do this but the sooner the better...): PM> http://fedora.laiskiainen.org/SRPMS.extras/synaptic-0.55.3-1.src.rpm I rebuilt this SRPMS on my system and installed it and it seems to work fine. One thing I did notice is that the ability to "hold" packages (which is claimed to have been added back in upstream according to the NEWS file) does not appear to be available. Alex From alexl at users.sourceforge.net Tue Jan 18 14:34:55 2005 From: alexl at users.sourceforge.net (Alex Lancaster) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 06:34:55 -0800 Subject: Fedora Project Wiki Message-ID: I was hoping to update the Wiki to note the availability of pre-extras for apt users, I have created an account: AlexLan. Can somebody add me to the EditGroup? Also it would be good if it was possible to forward the page: http://www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraHOWTO to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/FedoraHOWTO or otherwise note that fact that it is out of date. I tried editing it, but it appears it is read-only. Many users who I have helped setting up Fedora Extras on their machine before the big switch to fedoraproject.org go have bookmarked that page and would otherwise be unaware of the switch (since they wouldn't necessarily visit the top-level fedora.us page and see the announcement). Thanks, Alex From ville.skytta at iki.fi Tue Jan 18 19:46:21 2005 From: ville.skytta at iki.fi (Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Skytt=E4?=) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 21:46:21 +0200 Subject: Synaptic needs to rebuilt against new apt on pre-extras In-Reply-To: References: <7qacr7dm81.fsf@allele2.biol.berkeley.edu> Message-ID: <1106077581.32536.15.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 13:20 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > Oh, indeed. Seth: don't bother rebuilding the rather ancient version of > Synaptic currently in pre-extras, somebody with CVS commit access should > import a current version of it to CVS (I think Ville is about to do this > but the sooner the better...): > http://fedora.laiskiainen.org/SRPMS.extras/synaptic-0.55.3-1.src.rpm Done. From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 19 01:01:20 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 20:01:20 -0500 Subject: New/Updates Packages in Extras Message-ID: <1106096480.13831.5.camel@cutter> Hi all, New stuff built: abcde cd-discid dillo imlib2 taglib synaptic (i386 only) Follow updates and new packages at: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ Report problems at Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ -sv -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Mon Jan 24 03:17:40 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 22:17:40 -0500 Subject: New/Updates Extras Packages Message-ID: <1106536660.3597.12.camel@cutter> New Packages, cvs2cl (i386, x86_64) fwbuilder (i386, x86_64) graphviz (i386, x86_64) hddtemp (i386, x86_64) libfwbuilder (i386, x86_64) librsync (x86_64) nget (i386, x86_64) perl-MailTools (i386, x86_64) perl-MIME-tools (i386, x86_64) rdiff-backup (i386, x86_64) wxGTK (x86_64) Follow updates and new packages at: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ Report problems at Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ -sv -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From gmureddu at prodigy.net.mx Mon Jan 24 04:01:29 2005 From: gmureddu at prodigy.net.mx (Gain Paolo Mureddu) Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 22:01:29 -0600 Subject: YUM extras.repo file Message-ID: <41F47319.2010301@prodigy.net.mx> Where can I find the information on how to add a yum repository entry for extras.repo? Thanks, If this is not the list to send this to, please point to the right direction. From skvidal at phy.duke.edu Mon Jan 24 04:08:35 2005 From: skvidal at phy.duke.edu (seth vidal) Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 23:08:35 -0500 Subject: YUM extras.repo file In-Reply-To: <41F47319.2010301@prodigy.net.mx> References: <41F47319.2010301@prodigy.net.mx> Message-ID: <1106539716.3597.14.camel@cutter> On Sun, 2005-01-23 at 22:01 -0600, Gain Paolo Mureddu wrote: > Where can I find the information on how to add a yum repository > entry for extras.repo? > > Thanks, If this is not the list to send this to, please point to the > right direction. > this should explain it. http://fedoraproject.org/pre-extras/PRE-EXTRAS -sv From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Tue Jan 25 21:56:25 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:56:25 -0500 Subject: New x86_64 Packages in (pre) Extras Message-ID: <1106690185.30714.22.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> Hi Everyone, A bunch of new x86_64 packages built: adns audacity bochs camE duplicity gpgme03 giblib lyx nget pgadmin3 python-adns scorched3d seahorse xmms-sid Also I have brand new error/build logs up for other packages: General FC3 extras status: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras_2fFC3Status FC3 x86_64 build/error logs: http://fedoraproject.org/pre-extras/3/build-logs/x86_64/ Follow updates and new packages at: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ Report problems at Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ -sv From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 26 17:44:52 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:44:52 -0500 Subject: New Packages in Extras Message-ID: <1106761492.29597.38.camel@cutter> Hi, New packages: blender - x86_64 scons - x86, x86_64 i810switch - x86, x86_64 perl-Convert-Binhex - x86, x86_64 sqlite - x86 General FC3 extras status: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras_2fFC3Status Follow updates and new packages at: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ Report problems at Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ Thanks, -sv -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 26 18:15:12 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:15:12 -0500 Subject: cvs use and branches/dirs Message-ID: <1106763312.29597.42.camel@cutter> Hey, since we're rapidly approaching fc4test1 - would it make sense to make an FC3 dir now and do FC3 builds for extras from there and devel/fc4 from the devel dir? so we can separate the evrs, now? -sv -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 26 18:41:06 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:41:06 -0500 Subject: New Packages Message-ID: <1106764866.29597.54.camel@cutter> Some new/updated packages: libsigc++20 (x86, x86_64) glibmm24 (x86_64) gtkmm24 (x86, x86_64) libgnomecanvasmm26 (x86_64) libglademm24 (x86_64) General FC3 extras status: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras_2fFC3Status Follow updates and new packages at: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ Report problems at Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ Thanks, -sv -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Wed Jan 26 20:31:55 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:31:55 -0500 Subject: Even More new packages for FC3 Extras Message-ID: <1106771515.29597.70.camel@cutter> Hi, gconfmm26 (x86_64) ifplugd (x86_64) libglademm24 (x86_64) cvsgraph (i386, x86_64) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras_2fFC3Status Follow updates and new packages at: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ Report problems at Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ Thanks, -sv -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From toshio at tiki-lounge.com Thu Jan 27 19:20:11 2005 From: toshio at tiki-lounge.com (Toshio) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:20:11 -0500 Subject: cvs use and branches/dirs In-Reply-To: <1106763312.29597.42.camel@cutter> References: <1106763312.29597.42.camel@cutter> Message-ID: <1106853612.22178.26.camel@Madison.badger.com> On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 13:15 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > Hey, > since we're rapidly approaching fc4test1 - would it make sense to make > an FC3 dir now and do FC3 builds for extras from there and devel/fc4 > from the devel dir? > > so we can separate the evrs, now? > FWIW, yes. In the future, it would be nice to have a split when a release is pushed or when rawhide goes into release freeze (So we'd get an FC4 and devel branch just before FC4 is out.) This way, those who are working on packaging for the latest release can do so while those packaging for the latest release +1 can also work. Maybe it doesn't make as much sense for Extras as for Core, but I think it's still good so anything that breaks in the rush of changes just after release can be accommodated. -Toshio -- -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From gmureddu at prodigy.net.mx Thu Jan 27 19:36:48 2005 From: gmureddu at prodigy.net.mx (Gain Paolo Mureddu) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:36:48 -0600 Subject: cvs use and branches/dirs In-Reply-To: <1106853612.22178.26.camel@Madison.badger.com> References: <1106763312.29597.42.camel@cutter> Message-ID: <41F942D0.7020801@prodigy.net.mx> Toshio wrote: >FWIW, yes. > >In the future, it would be nice to have a split when a release is pushed >or when rawhide goes into release freeze (So we'd get an FC4 and devel >branch just before FC4 is out.) This way, those who are working on >packaging for the latest release can do so while those packaging for the >latest release +1 can also work. Maybe it doesn't make as much sense >for Extras as for Core, but I think it's still good so anything that >breaks in the rush of changes just after release can be accommodated. > >-Toshio > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >-- >fedora-extras-list mailing list >fedora-extras-list at redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list > > I think it is a good idea for Extras too, that way users who extensively use packages on Extras can upgrade faster and earlier, and won't have to wait for the FC4 packages to be available on Extras. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From skvidal at phy.duke.edu Thu Jan 27 19:54:54 2005 From: skvidal at phy.duke.edu (seth vidal) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:54:54 -0500 Subject: cvs use and branches/dirs In-Reply-To: <41F942D0.7020801@prodigy.net.mx> References: <1106763312.29597.42.camel@cutter> <41F942D0.7020801@prodigy.net.mx> Message-ID: <1106855694.25136.73.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> > > > > ____________________________________________________________________ > > > > -- > > fedora-extras-list mailing list > > fedora-extras-list at redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list > > > I think it is a good idea for Extras too, that way users who > extensively use packages on Extras can upgrade faster and earlier, and > won't have to wait for the FC4 packages to be available on Extras. The only problem we have is making sure that the E-V-Rs don't cause problems moving from fc3->fc4 + extras -sv From rdieter at math.unl.edu Thu Jan 27 19:58:15 2005 From: rdieter at math.unl.edu (Rex Dieter) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 13:58:15 -0600 Subject: cvs use and branches/dirs In-Reply-To: <1106855694.25136.73.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> References: <1106763312.29597.42.camel@cutter> <41F942D0.7020801@prodigy.net.mx> <1106855694.25136.73.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> Message-ID: <41F947D7.7090801@math.unl.edu> seth vidal wrote: >>>____________________________________________________________________ >>> >>>-- >>>fedora-extras-list mailing list >>>fedora-extras-list at redhat.com >>>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list >>> >> >>I think it is a good idea for Extras too, that way users who >>extensively use packages on Extras can upgrade faster and earlier, and >>won't have to wait for the FC4 packages to be available on Extras. > > > The only problem we have is making sure that the E-V-Rs don't cause > problems moving from fc3->fc4 + extras disttags anyone? *ducks and runs* -- Rex From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Thu Jan 27 21:35:35 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 16:35:35 -0500 Subject: New Packages in Extras Message-ID: <1106861735.25136.81.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> Hi, fontforge - x86, x86_64 glunarclock - x86 liferea - x86, x86_64 perl-Module-Build - x86, x86_64 stellarium - x86, x86_64 General FC3 extras status: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras_2fFC3Status Follow updates and new packages at: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ Report problems at Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ -sv From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 28 16:15:04 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:15:04 -0500 Subject: New Packages for Fedora Extras Fc3 Message-ID: <1106928904.26754.14.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> Gazpacho (x86, x86_64) -sv From thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net Fri Jan 28 16:49:36 2005 From: thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net (Matthias Saou) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 17:49:36 +0100 Subject: Possible new imports In-Reply-To: <20050114110855.4e375489@python2> References: <20050114110855.4e375489@python2> Message-ID: <20050128174936.04ff5689@python2> Matthias Saou wrote : > Here are some "new" packages I already have and would like to import into > Extras. Maybe some were already the centrer of ongoing fedora.us bugs, so > I'm posting here before just in case : > > php-eaccelerator > (this one is picking up where php-mmcache left off) > > SDL_gfx > (required by my latest perl-SDL package) > > Gtk-Perl > (old RH package still required by frozen-bubble) > > liboil > (library required by newest versions of swfdec) > > perl-libintl > (perl module for i18n required by dvd::rip) > > AFAICS, no legal blur, no major conflicts... all pretty simple. Replying to myself, just to point out that as there were no objections, I've imported them all. The "Gtk-Perl" kept its old name (wasn't renamed to perl-gtk or similar) since it's a "legacy" package, really not worth bothering. Now the next package I'd like to import is yasm, a BSD-licensed rewrite of nasm with a wider architecture scope (x86_64 and ppc most notably). It is now used by the development branch of the XviD codec for its assembler routines on x86_64 and ppc. The license is ok, there is no file overlap with nasm whatsoever, so it seems like a good candidate. Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) - Linux kernel 2.6.10-1.753_FC3 Load : 1.04 1.01 0.83 From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Fri Jan 28 23:02:28 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:02:28 -0500 Subject: New Packages in Fedora Extras FC3 Message-ID: <1106953348.28478.12.camel@cutter> * php-eaccelerator (x86, x86_64) * SDL_gfx (x86, x86_64) * Gtk-Perl (x86, x86_64) * liboil (x86, x86_64) * perl-libintl (x86, x86_64) * gnome-vfsmm26 (x86_64) * libgnomemm26 (x86_64) * libgnomeuimm26 (x86_64) * audacity (x86_64) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras_2fFC3Status Follow updates and new packages at: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ Report problems at Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ Thanks, -sv -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From gmureddu at prodigy.net.mx Fri Jan 28 23:16:44 2005 From: gmureddu at prodigy.net.mx (Gain Paolo Mureddu) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 17:16:44 -0600 Subject: An Extras package request. Message-ID: <41FAC7DC.2080106@prodigy.net.mx> I think it would be also a good idea to see if it would be possible to add to the Extras repository the program ReZound program. I have used it regularly to do sound editing work whenever I had to. I've also used Audacity, though I find it lacking of many of the features ReZound provides (not to mention a *slick* user interface!). The page somewhat outdated and Davy Durham, creator and mantainer of the program has been slowly working to improve it. I know it is not as known as Audacity is, but I think it would be a good addition to the Extras repo, since it has a 'pro' feel to it too (and is more than suited for professional tasks too). Website: http://rezound.sourceforge.net Thanks. Gian. From denis at poolshark.org Fri Jan 28 23:45:40 2005 From: denis at poolshark.org (Denis Leroy) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:45:40 -0800 Subject: An Extras package request. In-Reply-To: <41FAC7DC.2080106@prodigy.net.mx> References: <41FAC7DC.2080106@prodigy.net.mx> Message-ID: <41FACEA4.7070406@poolshark.org> Hmm, it seems to be using some sort of C++-based graphical toolkit called libFOX that i had never heard of (and looks an aweful lot like Windows). Does anyone here have experience with it ? -denis Gain Paolo Mureddu wrote: > I think it would be also a good idea to see if it would be possible > to add to the Extras repository the program ReZound program. I have used > it regularly to do sound editing work whenever I had to. I've also used > Audacity, though I find it lacking of many of the features ReZound > provides (not to mention a *slick* user interface!). The page somewhat > outdated and Davy Durham, creator and mantainer of the program has been > slowly working to improve it. I know it is not as known as Audacity is, > but I think it would be a good addition to the Extras repo, since it has > a 'pro' feel to it too (and is more than suited for professional tasks > too). > > Website: > > http://rezound.sourceforge.net > > Thanks. > > Gian. > > -- > fedora-extras-list mailing list > fedora-extras-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list From gmureddu at prodigy.net.mx Fri Jan 28 23:59:12 2005 From: gmureddu at prodigy.net.mx (Gain Paolo Mureddu) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 17:59:12 -0600 Subject: An Extras package request. In-Reply-To: <41FACEA4.7070406@poolshark.org> References: <41FAC7DC.2080106@prodigy.net.mx> <41FACEA4.7070406@poolshark.org> Message-ID: <41FAD1D0.7000804@prodigy.net.mx> Denis Leroy wrote: > Hmm, it seems to be using some sort of C++-based graphical toolkit > called libFOX that i had never heard of (and looks an aweful lot like > Windows). Does anyone here have experience with it ? > > -denis > > -- > fedora-extras-list mailing list > fedora-extras-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list > While it looks somewhat like it, it behaves totally differently (or IMO) and works just fine. I like (very much) the way the editing area is layed out, not to mention the indicators. The menues are also very well implemented and one of its killer characteristics is that you can place markers to separate tracks and just select from within the application to master to CD using cdrdao (which might be needed as a dependency, BTW... and I've noticed FC3 doesn't include it by default with default install options). From fedora at wir-sind-cool.org Sat Jan 29 00:09:35 2005 From: fedora at wir-sind-cool.org (Michael Schwendt) Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 01:09:35 +0100 Subject: An Extras package request. In-Reply-To: <41FACEA4.7070406@poolshark.org> References: <41FAC7DC.2080106@prodigy.net.mx> <41FACEA4.7070406@poolshark.org> Message-ID: <20050129010935.6795a0f8.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:45:40 -0800, Denis Leroy wrote: > Hmm, it seems to be using some sort of C++-based graphical toolkit > called libFOX that i had never heard of (and looks an aweful lot like > Windows). Does anyone here have experience with it ? Saw it in the fedora.us queue long ago, and... it had several issues apart from low priority: https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=619 From gmureddu at prodigy.net.mx Sat Jan 29 00:17:51 2005 From: gmureddu at prodigy.net.mx (Gain Paolo Mureddu) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:17:51 -0600 Subject: An Extras package request. In-Reply-To: <20050129010935.6795a0f8.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> References: <41FAC7DC.2080106@prodigy.net.mx> <41FACEA4.7070406@poolshark.org> Message-ID: <41FAD62F.3010705@prodigy.net.mx> Michael Schwendt wrote: >Saw it in the fedora.us queue long ago, and... it had several issues >apart from low priority: https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=619 > >-- >fedora-extras-list mailing list >fedora-extras-list at redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list > > > I haven't seen any of those mentioned problems when buiding the whole package from source, but your mileage may vary. From fedora at wir-sind-cool.org Sat Jan 29 00:27:06 2005 From: fedora at wir-sind-cool.org (Michael Schwendt) Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 01:27:06 +0100 Subject: An Extras package request. In-Reply-To: <41FAD62F.3010705@prodigy.net.mx> References: <41FAC7DC.2080106@prodigy.net.mx> <41FACEA4.7070406@poolshark.org> <41FAD62F.3010705@prodigy.net.mx> Message-ID: <20050129012706.3776ff1c.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:17:51 -0600, Gain Paolo Mureddu wrote: > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > >Saw it in the fedora.us queue long ago, and... it had several issues > >apart from low priority: https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=619 > > > I haven't seen any of those mentioned problems when buiding the whole > package from source, but your mileage may vary. Well, that was end of 2003, now we have 2005. Also, packaging up the whole thing with RPM requires a bit more than just compiling the source code. Feel free to contribute packages for the FOX toolkit and the audio editor you refer to. It's good to have alternatives and competition in that area. From gmureddu at prodigy.net.mx Sat Jan 29 00:34:00 2005 From: gmureddu at prodigy.net.mx (Gain Paolo Mureddu) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:34:00 -0600 Subject: An Extras package request. In-Reply-To: <20050129012706.3776ff1c.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> References: <41FAC7DC.2080106@prodigy.net.mx> <41FACEA4.7070406@poolshark.org> <41FAD62F.3010705@prodigy.net.mx> <"200501290 12706.3776ff1c.fedora"@wir-sind-cool.org> Message-ID: <41FAD9F8.7000809@prodigy.net.mx> Michael Schwendt wrote: >On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:17:51 -0600, Gain Paolo Mureddu wrote: > > > >Well, that was end of 2003, now we have 2005. Also, packaging up the whole >thing with RPM requires a bit more than just compiling the source code. >Feel free to contribute packages for the FOX toolkit and the audio editor >you refer to. It's good to have alternatives and competition in that area. > >-- >fedora-extras-list mailing list >fedora-extras-list at redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list > > > Will try... I have really little (next to none) experience building rpm packages... But I will certainly do my best to try and contribute to the project that has given me so much (Fedora). From nando at ccrma.Stanford.EDU Sat Jan 29 01:06:51 2005 From: nando at ccrma.Stanford.EDU (Fernando Lopez-Lezcano) Date: 28 Jan 2005 17:06:51 -0800 Subject: An Extras package request. In-Reply-To: <20050129012706.3776ff1c.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> References: <41FAC7DC.2080106@prodigy.net.mx> <41FACEA4.7070406@poolshark.org> <41FAD62F.3010705@prodigy.net.mx> <20050129012706.3776ff1c.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> Message-ID: <1106960810.32357.599.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu> On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 16:27, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:17:51 -0600, Gain Paolo Mureddu wrote: > > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > >Saw it in the fedora.us queue long ago, and... it had several issues > > >apart from low priority: https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=619 > > > I haven't seen any of those mentioned problems when buiding the whole > > package from source, but your mileage may vary. > > Well, that was end of 2003, now we have 2005. Also, packaging up the whole > thing with RPM requires a bit more than just compiling the source code. > Feel free to contribute packages for the FOX toolkit and the audio editor > you refer to. It's good to have alternatives and competition in that area. I already have packages available as part of the Planet CCRMA repository (for both). I don't have (yet) Fedora Extras cvs access so I can't contribute directly, but I could send spec files and/or patches if that would help. Rezound is nice, but it has an additional (admittedly optional) dependency, the Jack Audio Connection Kit. That is one of the packages that I would eventually like to help include in FE as a _lot_ of very nice audio packages depend on Jack being available. -- Fernando From gmureddu at prodigy.net.mx Sat Jan 29 01:11:29 2005 From: gmureddu at prodigy.net.mx (Gain Paolo Mureddu) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 19:11:29 -0600 Subject: An Extras package request. In-Reply-To: <1106960810.32357.599.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu> References: <41FAC7DC.2080106@prodigy.net.mx> <41FACEA4.7070406@poolshark.org> <41FAD62F.3010705@prodigy.net.mx> <"20050129 0 12706.3776ff1c.fedora"@wir-sind-cool.org> <1106960810.32357.599.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu> Message-ID: <41FAE2C1.8020304@prodigy.net.mx> Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: >I already have packages available as part of the Planet CCRMA repository >(for both). I don't have (yet) Fedora Extras cvs access so I can't >contribute directly, but I could send spec files and/or patches if that >would help. > >Rezound is nice, but it has an additional (admittedly optional) >dependency, the Jack Audio Connection Kit. That is one of the packages >that I would eventually like to help include in FE as a _lot_ of very >nice audio packages depend on Jack being available. > >-- Fernando > > >-- >fedora-extras-list mailing list >fedora-extras-list at redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list > > > Cierto!! se me olvidaba Jack!! Oops! Sorry :-D I forgot about Jack too!... From nando at ccrma.Stanford.EDU Sat Jan 29 01:12:46 2005 From: nando at ccrma.Stanford.EDU (Fernando Lopez-Lezcano) Date: 28 Jan 2005 17:12:46 -0800 Subject: An Extras package request. In-Reply-To: <1106960810.32357.599.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu> References: <41FAC7DC.2080106@prodigy.net.mx> <41FACEA4.7070406@poolshark.org> <41FAD62F.3010705@prodigy.net.mx> <20050129012706.3776ff1c.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> <1106960810.32357.599.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu> Message-ID: <1106961166.32357.611.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu> On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 17:06, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 16:27, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:17:51 -0600, Gain Paolo Mureddu wrote: > > > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > >Saw it in the fedora.us queue long ago, and... it had several issues > > > >apart from low priority: https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=619 > > > > > I haven't seen any of those mentioned problems when buiding the whole > > > package from source, but your mileage may vary. > > > > Well, that was end of 2003, now we have 2005. Also, packaging up the whole > > thing with RPM requires a bit more than just compiling the source code. > > Feel free to contribute packages for the FOX toolkit and the audio editor > > you refer to. It's good to have alternatives and competition in that area. > > I already have packages available as part of the Planet CCRMA repository > (for both). I don't have (yet) Fedora Extras cvs access so I can't > contribute directly, but I could send spec files and/or patches if that > would help. > > Rezound is nice, but it has an additional (admittedly optional) > dependency, the Jack Audio Connection Kit. That is one of the packages > that I would eventually like to help include in FE as a _lot_ of very > nice audio packages depend on Jack being available. And another one I forgot about, don't know if it is already in FE: http://sky.prohosting.com/oparviai/soundtouch/ (I also have packages for this) -- Fernando From gmureddu at prodigy.net.mx Sat Jan 29 01:19:08 2005 From: gmureddu at prodigy.net.mx (Gain Paolo Mureddu) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 19:19:08 -0600 Subject: An Extras package request. In-Reply-To: <1106961166.32357.611.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu> References: <41FAC7DC.2080106@prodigy.net.mx> <41FACEA4.7070406@poolshark.org> <41FAD62F.3010705@prodigy.net.mx> <"20050129 0 12706.3776ff1c.fedora"@wir-sind-cool.org> <1106961166.32357.611.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu> Message-ID: <41FAE48C.3020402@prodigy.net.mx> Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: >On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 17:06, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > > >>On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 16:27, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> >> >>>On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:17:51 -0600, Gain Paolo Mureddu wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Michael Schwendt wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Saw it in the fedora.us queue long ago, and... it had several issues >>>>>apart from low priority: https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=619 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>I haven't seen any of those mentioned problems when buiding the whole >>>>package from source, but your mileage may vary. >>>> >>>> >>>Well, that was end of 2003, now we have 2005. Also, packaging up the whole >>>thing with RPM requires a bit more than just compiling the source code. >>>Feel free to contribute packages for the FOX toolkit and the audio editor >>>you refer to. It's good to have alternatives and competition in that area. >>> >>> >>I already have packages available as part of the Planet CCRMA repository >>(for both). I don't have (yet) Fedora Extras cvs access so I can't >>contribute directly, but I could send spec files and/or patches if that >>would help. >> >>Rezound is nice, but it has an additional (admittedly optional) >>dependency, the Jack Audio Connection Kit. That is one of the packages >>that I would eventually like to help include in FE as a _lot_ of very >>nice audio packages depend on Jack being available. >> >> > >And another one I forgot about, don't know if it is already in FE: >http://sky.prohosting.com/oparviai/soundtouch/ >(I also have packages for this) >-- Fernando > > >-- >fedora-extras-list mailing list >fedora-extras-list at redhat.com >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list > > > Looks very interesting, but I wonder how does this differ from some LADSPA plug-ins that do this? From nando at ccrma.Stanford.EDU Sat Jan 29 01:27:37 2005 From: nando at ccrma.Stanford.EDU (Fernando Lopez-Lezcano) Date: 28 Jan 2005 17:27:37 -0800 Subject: An Extras package request. In-Reply-To: <41FAE48C.3020402@prodigy.net.mx> References: <41FAC7DC.2080106@prodigy.net.mx> <41FACEA4.7070406@poolshark.org> <41FAD62F.3010705@prodigy.net.mx> <"20050129 0 12706.3776ff1c.fedora"@wir-sind-cool.org> <1106961166.32357.611.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu> <41FAE48C.3020402@prodigy.net.mx> Message-ID: <1106962057.32358.634.camel@cmn37.stanford.edu> On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 17:19, Gain Paolo Mureddu wrote: > Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > >On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 17:06, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote: > >>On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 16:27, Michael Schwendt wrote: > >>>On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:17:51 -0600, Gain Paolo Mureddu wrote: > >>>>Michael Schwendt wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>Saw it in the fedora.us queue long ago, and... it had several issues > >>>>>apart from low priority: https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=619 > >>>>> > >>>>I haven't seen any of those mentioned problems when buiding the whole > >>>>package from source, but your mileage may vary. > >>>> > >>>Well, that was end of 2003, now we have 2005. Also, packaging up the whole > >>>thing with RPM requires a bit more than just compiling the source code. > >>>Feel free to contribute packages for the FOX toolkit and the audio editor > >>>you refer to. It's good to have alternatives and competition in that area. > >>> > >>I already have packages available as part of the Planet CCRMA repository > >>(for both). I don't have (yet) Fedora Extras cvs access so I can't > >>contribute directly, but I could send spec files and/or patches if that > >>would help. > >> > >>Rezound is nice, but it has an additional (admittedly optional) > >>dependency, the Jack Audio Connection Kit. That is one of the packages > >>that I would eventually like to help include in FE as a _lot_ of very > >>nice audio packages depend on Jack being available. > > > >And another one I forgot about, don't know if it is already in FE: > >http://sky.prohosting.com/oparviai/soundtouch/ > >(I also have packages for this) > > > Looks very interesting, but I wonder how does this differ from some > LADSPA plug-ins that do this? Which plugin? The interesting aspect of soundtouch is that it does not do just sample rate conversion (like libsamplerate). It can do time stretching and/or pitch shifting. A normal sample rate conversion process can change the pitch of a signal but the length changes as well. -- Fernando From wtogami at redhat.com Sat Jan 29 02:44:01 2005 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:44:01 -1000 Subject: cvs use and branches/dirs In-Reply-To: <1106763312.29597.42.camel@cutter> References: <1106763312.29597.42.camel@cutter> Message-ID: <41FAF871.2070308@redhat.com> seth vidal wrote: > Hey, > since we're rapidly approaching fc4test1 - would it make sense to make > an FC3 dir now and do FC3 builds for extras from there and devel/fc4 > from the devel dir? > > so we can separate the evrs, now? > Agreement here. I will make this happen so we can build Extras for FC3 and FC4 in parallel. The FC4 Extras may need to be rebuilt when we discover API/ABI changes, but this should settle down before FC4 final of course. Warren Togami wtogami at redhat.com From skvidal at phy.duke.edu Sat Jan 29 03:06:39 2005 From: skvidal at phy.duke.edu (seth vidal) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 22:06:39 -0500 Subject: cvs use and branches/dirs In-Reply-To: <41FAF871.2070308@redhat.com> References: <1106763312.29597.42.camel@cutter> <41FAF871.2070308@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1106967999.1614.13.camel@cutter> On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 16:44 -1000, Warren Togami wrote: > seth vidal wrote: > > Hey, > > since we're rapidly approaching fc4test1 - would it make sense to make > > an FC3 dir now and do FC3 builds for extras from there and devel/fc4 > > from the devel dir? > > > > so we can separate the evrs, now? > > > > Agreement here. I will make this happen so we can build Extras for FC3 > and FC4 in parallel. The FC4 Extras may need to be rebuilt when we > discover API/ABI changes, but this should settle down before FC4 final > of course. Why don't we always do this. so when fc4 final comes out we do an fc4 branch and make devel into fc5, etc? -sv From wtogami at redhat.com Sat Jan 29 09:07:56 2005 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 23:07:56 -1000 Subject: cvs use and branches/dirs In-Reply-To: <1106967999.1614.13.camel@cutter> References: <1106763312.29597.42.camel@cutter> <41FAF871.2070308@redhat.com> <1106967999.1614.13.camel@cutter> Message-ID: <41FB526C.305@redhat.com> seth vidal wrote: >> >>Agreement here. I will make this happen so we can build Extras for FC3 >>and FC4 in parallel. The FC4 Extras may need to be rebuilt when we >>discover API/ABI changes, but this should settle down before FC4 final >>of course. > > > Why don't we always do this. so when fc4 final comes out we do an fc4 > branch and make devel into fc5, etc? Gafton didn't like that idea when we were first planning this, but now it seems that it makes a lot of sense. I think the concern was that the difference between devel and the latest stable distribution Extras would be *nothing* for a long while, so it would be a lot of redundant CVS commit spam and effort. Maybe a compromise of a month or two after a stable release for branch splitting would be good, or at least when API/ABI begins to diverge and it becomes infeasible to use the previous Extras repository with rawhide anymore. We can think about this more as FC4 final approaches. Warren Togami wtogami at redhat.com From dino at pakishop.com Sat Jan 29 08:35:20 2005 From: dino at pakishop.com (dinar ali kadri) Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 13:35:20 +0500 Subject: help needed for mailman Message-ID: <20050129083520.GG5531@dino.pakishop.com> hi, i am trying to configure mailman on fedora core 2. i made everything and did the aliases as well but the problem is this when i subscribe as a test to see if its working after that i check on smtp-failure log and i finds (3959) SMTP session failure: 553, 5.3.0 ... user User unknown so what shall i do to make unix-bounce as unix-bounce at pakishop.com in my aliase or i have to do some more changes ?or i missconfigured something please point me out .i think it should look like a local mail address then a masqueraded. i know i did everything in a rush and making some silly mistake.Is there any one can point my mistake out and tell me where should i start? thanks bye From wtogami at redhat.com Sat Jan 29 20:48:54 2005 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 10:48:54 -1000 Subject: help needed for mailman In-Reply-To: <20050129083520.GG5531@dino.pakishop.com> References: <20050129083520.GG5531@dino.pakishop.com> Message-ID: <41FBF6B6.4050701@redhat.com> dinar ali kadri wrote: > hi, > > i am trying to configure mailman on fedora core 2. i made everything > and did the aliases as well but the problem is this when i subscribe > as a test to see if its working after that i check on smtp-failure log > and i finds > (3959) SMTP session failure: 553, 5.3.0 ... > user User unknown > > so what shall i do to make unix-bounce as unix-bounce at pakishop.com in > my aliase or i have to do some more changes ?or i missconfigured > something please point me out .i think it should look like a local mail > address then a masqueraded. > > i know i did everything in a rush and making some silly mistake.Is > there any one can point my mistake out and tell me where should i start? > You are posting to the wrong mailing list. This mailing list is for discussion of Fedora Extras. You must go to either fedora-list or mailman's upstream lists. Warren Togami wtogami at redhat.com From fedora at wir-sind-cool.org Sat Jan 29 21:29:51 2005 From: fedora at wir-sind-cool.org (Michael Schwendt) Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 22:29:51 +0100 Subject: Orphaned and potentially unmaintained packages Message-ID: <20050129222951.13be6bcd.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> Long overdue, a list of unmaintained and potentially unmaintained packages: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/OrphanedPackages From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Sat Jan 29 22:17:06 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:17:06 -0500 Subject: New Packages Message-ID: <1107037026.1614.75.camel@cutter> Hi Folks, New and updated Packages: gc (x86_64, i386) irssi (x86_64, i386) inkscape (x86_64) libsafe (i386) synaptic (i386) rpmlint (i386, x86_64) fontforge (i386, x86_64) I really need to automate these messages. :) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras_2fFC3Status Follow updates and new packages at: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ Report problems at Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ Thanks, -sv -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From dino at pakishop.com Sat Jan 29 13:46:00 2005 From: dino at pakishop.com (dinar ali kadri) Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 18:46:00 +0500 Subject: need help for mailman configuration Message-ID: <20050129134600.GA7496@dino.pakishop.com> Hi when i request to subscribe a list on mailman page after that i check my smtp-failure log i finds this error: Jan 29 12:36:26 2005 (3959) SMTP session failure: 553, 5.3.0 ... user User unknown, msgid: i want to know what to do coz in my aliases it is unix-bounces not unix-bounces at pakishop.com. my mailserver name is info.pakishop.com but i masquerade it in pakishop.com so then what is a mistake which i am making ?should i masquerade entire domain in my sendmail macros or shall i change something else ? My http server name is www.pakishop.com so is it okay for giving mailman URL a virtual host name which is info.pakishop.com. THanks From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Sun Jan 30 04:00:35 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 23:00:35 -0500 Subject: New Package updates Message-ID: <1107057635.1614.94.camel@cutter> awstats (i386, x86_64) (security) zope (i386, x86_64) libkexif (i386, x86_64) showimg (i386, x86_64) gwenview (i386, x86_64) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras_2fFC3Status Follow updates and new packages at: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ Report problems at Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ Thanks, -sv -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de Sun Jan 30 10:34:45 2005 From: andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de (Andreas Bierfert) Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 11:34:45 +0100 Subject: Orphaned and potentially unmaintained packages In-Reply-To: <20050129222951.13be6bcd.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> References: <20050129222951.13be6bcd.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> Message-ID: <41FCB845.7050700@lowlatency.de> Michael Schwendt wrote: > Long overdue, a list of unmaintained and potentially unmaintained > packages: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/OrphanedPackages I still do maintain centericq. Actually I did send Seth some diffs for updated packages agains fedora-extras cvs... -Andreas -- Andreas Bierfert | http://awbsworld.de | GPG: C58CF1CB andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de | http://lowlatency.de | signed/encrypted phone: +49 2402 102373 | () ASCII ribbon campaign | mail preferred cell: +49 172 9789968 | /\ against HTML mail | From fedora at wir-sind-cool.org Sun Jan 30 13:18:47 2005 From: fedora at wir-sind-cool.org (Michael Schwendt) Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 14:18:47 +0100 Subject: Orphaned and potentially unmaintained packages In-Reply-To: <41FCB845.7050700@lowlatency.de> References: <20050129222951.13be6bcd.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> <41FCB845.7050700@lowlatency.de> Message-ID: <20050130141847.03a88382.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 11:34:45 +0100, Andreas Bierfert wrote: > > Long overdue, a list of unmaintained and potentially unmaintained > > packages: > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/OrphanedPackages > > I still do maintain centericq. Actually I did send Seth some diffs for updated > packages agains fedora-extras cvs... Well, I can't comment on that. I just noticed that the latest version in the repositories for FC3 and older is from middle of 2003. From skvidal at phy.duke.edu Sun Jan 30 15:55:39 2005 From: skvidal at phy.duke.edu (seth vidal) Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:55:39 -0500 Subject: Orphaned and potentially unmaintained packages In-Reply-To: <20050130141847.03a88382.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> References: <20050129222951.13be6bcd.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> <41FCB845.7050700@lowlatency.de> <20050130141847.03a88382.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> Message-ID: <1107100539.1614.102.camel@cutter> On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 14:18 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 11:34:45 +0100, Andreas Bierfert wrote: > > > > Long overdue, a list of unmaintained and potentially unmaintained > > > packages: > > > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/OrphanedPackages > > > > I still do maintain centericq. Actually I did send Seth some diffs for updated > > packages agains fedora-extras cvs... > > Well, I can't comment on that. I just noticed that the latest version > in the repositories for FC3 and older is from middle of 2003. > He did send them to me, but I can't check them in :) -sv From fedora at wir-sind-cool.org Sun Jan 30 18:11:40 2005 From: fedora at wir-sind-cool.org (Michael Schwendt) Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 19:11:40 +0100 Subject: Orphaned and potentially unmaintained packages In-Reply-To: <1107100539.1614.102.camel@cutter> References: <20050129222951.13be6bcd.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> <41FCB845.7050700@lowlatency.de> <20050130141847.03a88382.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> <1107100539.1614.102.camel@cutter> Message-ID: <20050130191140.540f2f4f.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 10:55:39 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > > > > Long overdue, a list of unmaintained and potentially unmaintained > > > > packages: > > > > > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/OrphanedPackages > > > > > > I still do maintain centericq. Actually I did send Seth some diffs for updated > > > packages agains fedora-extras cvs... > > > > Well, I can't comment on that. I just noticed that the latest version > > in the repositories for FC3 and older is from middle of 2003. > > > > He did send them to me, but I can't check them in :) *shrug* Ville, for instance, would cvs-import a src.rpm if there were an update request at fedora.us for FC3 and older. That has been usual procedure for many packages since CVS was announced. From ville.skytta at iki.fi Sun Jan 30 18:53:19 2005 From: ville.skytta at iki.fi (Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Skytt=E4?=) Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 20:53:19 +0200 Subject: Extras submissions (was: Re: Orphaned and potentially unmaintained packages) In-Reply-To: <20050130191140.540f2f4f.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> References: <20050129222951.13be6bcd.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> <41FCB845.7050700@lowlatency.de> <20050130141847.03a88382.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> <1107100539.1614.102.camel@cutter> <20050130191140.540f2f4f.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> Message-ID: <1107111199.4018.252.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 19:11 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > *shrug* Ville, for instance, would cvs-import a src.rpm if there were an > update request at fedora.us for FC3 and older. That has been usual > procedure for many packages since CVS was announced. Yes, that works pretty well. The benefit of signed SRPM submissions from trusted packagers is that the submission contains all the sources that the submitter has been using and which (s)he has already verified not containing malicious code etc. So, it's less work for the one who imports it, no further source verification has to be done (but of course may, if the importer so desires), and one can just use the tools available in the CVS repo and import it, not that much manual work involved. I would also suggest that if one submits changes targetting >= FC3 only, don't use the "0.fdr." release prefix. If older distros are targeted, _do_ use it. The fedora.us build system still used building for < FC3 operates on SRPMs and md5sums, and can do some modifications to the release tag on the fly; that capability does not unfortunately include adding the 0.fdr prefix, which is still necessary for < FC3 builds due to (pre-)Extras builds no more using the same "disttag" scheme. When done this way, it's less work for everyone involved; I will use the submission as-is for < FC3 builds in the fedora.us build system, and will manually tweak the release tag before importing to Extras CVS, and the submitter can keep on submitting a single SRPM (assuming it works for all target distro versions). Please also consider whether you _really_ want to submit updates for older distro versions, and be prepared to verify all those builds if you do. Once the FC4 branch is open, the amount of needed manual work will increase, and we'll see whether the suggestions above will need adjustments. Hopefully by that time there will be an official Extras build system as well as quite a few more people with CVS commit access who can take care of the commits themselves. From fedora at wir-sind-cool.org Sun Jan 30 19:43:16 2005 From: fedora at wir-sind-cool.org (Michael Schwendt) Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 20:43:16 +0100 Subject: Extras submissions (was: Re: Orphaned and potentially unmaintained packages) In-Reply-To: <1107111199.4018.252.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> References: <20050129222951.13be6bcd.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> <41FCB845.7050700@lowlatency.de> <20050130141847.03a88382.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> <1107100539.1614.102.camel@cutter> <20050130191140.540f2f4f.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> <1107111199.4018.252.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> Message-ID: <20050130204316.3e19c438.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 20:53:19 +0200, Ville Skytt? wrote: > Please also consider whether you > _really_ want to submit updates for older distro versions, and be > prepared to verify all those builds if you do. Another area where the list of unmaintained packages will kick in: package owner no longer has access to an old distribution to test with. In that case, a solution must be found for all distris which are still supported by Fedora Legacy. Either 1), a separate package owner takes over maintenance and testing for a specific legacy dist version. Or 2), updates, provided that they build also for old distris, are released into "testing" for that distri, and community QA contributors can decide on whether and when to promote a package into "stable" repo. Alternatively, "testing" is used like updates-testing, and packages are promoted after an announced time-out of e.g. 7-14 days. Currently, FC3 is the current distribution. FC2 is not legacy yet, but will be transferred to Fedora Legacy soon. FC1 is legacy. From ville.skytta at iki.fi Sun Jan 30 20:20:04 2005 From: ville.skytta at iki.fi (Ville =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Skytt=E4?=) Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 22:20:04 +0200 Subject: Extras submissions (was: Re: Orphaned and potentially unmaintained packages) In-Reply-To: <20050130204316.3e19c438.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> References: <20050129222951.13be6bcd.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> <41FCB845.7050700@lowlatency.de> <20050130141847.03a88382.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> <1107100539.1614.102.camel@cutter> <20050130191140.540f2f4f.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> <1107111199.4018.252.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> <20050130204316.3e19c438.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> Message-ID: <1107116404.4018.275.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 20:43 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 20:53:19 +0200, Ville Skytt? wrote: > > > Please also consider whether you > > _really_ want to submit updates for older distro versions, and be > > prepared to verify all those builds if you do. > > Another area where the list of unmaintained packages will kick in: package > owner no longer has access to an old distribution to test with. In that > case, a solution must be found for all distris which are still supported > by Fedora Legacy. When a Core release enters Legacy, IMO it would make sense to split the corresponding Extras distro components and move them over to extras- legacy or something at the same time, and apply the fedoralegacy.org criteria for further updates to them. Hopefully fedoralegacy.org could also host the BTS and mirrors for extras-legacy. Whether the packager providing updates for the Legacy Extras distros and the current ones is the same one doesn't really matter. Or whether there is a designated Extras Legacy maintainer at all, actually. IMHO, it's better to not update legacy stuff at all than to release blindfolded it-builds-so-it-works updates, even into a "testing" repository. Disclaimer: I'm not involved with Fedora Legacy nor speaking for them at all, just throwing in some ideas. From fedora at wir-sind-cool.org Sun Jan 30 21:51:21 2005 From: fedora at wir-sind-cool.org (Michael Schwendt) Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 22:51:21 +0100 Subject: Extras submissions (was: Re: Orphaned and potentially unmaintained packages) In-Reply-To: <1107116404.4018.275.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> References: <20050129222951.13be6bcd.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> <41FCB845.7050700@lowlatency.de> <20050130141847.03a88382.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> <1107100539.1614.102.camel@cutter> <20050130191140.540f2f4f.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> <1107111199.4018.252.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> <20050130204316.3e19c438.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> <1107116404.4018.275.camel@bobcat.mine.nu> Message-ID: <20050130225121.76aef81d.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 22:20:04 +0200, Ville Skytt? wrote: > When a Core release enters Legacy, IMO it would make sense to split the > corresponding Extras distro components and move them over to extras- > legacy or something at the same time, and apply the fedoralegacy.org > criteria for further updates to them. Hopefully fedoralegacy.org could > also host the BTS and mirrors for extras-legacy. Hmmm, some time in the future, Fedora Extras would benefit from a dedicated security team and vendor-sec info, too. Right now it would help if community contributors, who monitor bugtraq and similar lists, report incidents in bugzilla. > Whether the packager providing updates for the Legacy Extras distros and > the current ones is the same one doesn't really matter. Or whether > there is a designated Extras Legacy maintainer at all, actually. Agreed. In either case, if no one reported a vulnerability, even if it were announced publicly on respective mailing-lists, the uncertainty of offering outdated and vulnerable packages is undesirable. So, if something is considered unsupported, it ought to be announced as such. Is deleting an individual package an option when it is known that it's vulnerable? > IMHO, it's better to not update legacy stuff at all than to release > blindfolded it-builds-so-it-works updates, even into a "testing" > repository. Yeah, we need guidelines or policies for this. Packagers often track only the current distribution version and maybe one older one or a relative, e.g. RHEL. From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Sun Jan 30 23:17:01 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 18:17:01 -0500 Subject: Extras Package Updates Message-ID: <1107127021.1614.140.camel@cutter> hi all, firestarter x86, x86_64 updated in fc3 extras. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras_2fFC3Status Follow updates and new packages at: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ Report problems at Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ Thanks, -sv -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net Mon Jan 31 09:32:37 2005 From: thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net (Matthias Saou) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:32:37 +0100 Subject: Orphaned and potentially unmaintained packages In-Reply-To: <20050129222951.13be6bcd.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> References: <20050129222951.13be6bcd.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> Message-ID: <20050131103237.706401de@python2> Michael Schwendt wrote : > Long overdue, a list of unmaintained and potentially unmaintained > packages: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/OrphanedPackages I could definitely pick up easytag and xmms-crossfade, as I've been packaging them for a while and are two packages I use myself very frequently. Who can decide this btw? Matthias -- Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/ Fedora Core release 3 (Heidelberg) - Linux kernel 2.6.10-1.753_FC3 Load : 0.12 0.58 0.54 From fedora at leemhuis.info Mon Jan 31 09:38:48 2005 From: fedora at leemhuis.info (Thorsten Leemhuis) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 10:38:48 +0100 Subject: Orphaned and potentially unmaintained packages In-Reply-To: <20050131103237.706401de@python2> References: <20050129222951.13be6bcd.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> <20050131103237.706401de@python2> Message-ID: <1107164328.5943.2.camel@thl.ct.heise.de> Am Montag, den 31.01.2005, 10:32 +0100 schrieb Matthias Saou: > Michael Schwendt wrote : > > > Long overdue, a list of unmaintained and potentially unmaintained > > packages: > > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/OrphanedPackages > > I could definitely pick up easytag and xmms-crossfade, as I've been > packaging them for a while and are two packages I use myself very > frequently. While at it: I can pick up ghex if nobody else is interested. I need it now and then. CU thl -- Thorsten Leemhuis From wtogami at redhat.com Mon Jan 31 09:44:08 2005 From: wtogami at redhat.com (Warren Togami) Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 23:44:08 -1000 Subject: Orphaned and potentially unmaintained packages In-Reply-To: <20050131103237.706401de@python2> References: <20050129222951.13be6bcd.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> <20050131103237.706401de@python2> Message-ID: <41FDFDE8.5010803@redhat.com> Matthias Saou wrote: > Michael Schwendt wrote : > > >>Long overdue, a list of unmaintained and potentially unmaintained >>packages: >> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/OrphanedPackages > > > I could definitely pick up easytag and xmms-crossfade, as I've been > packaging them for a while and are two packages I use myself very > frequently. > > Who can decide this btw? > > Matthias > Just declare it so at this point. If nobody objects then no problem. Warren From pcompton at proteinmedia.com Mon Jan 31 11:12:53 2005 From: pcompton at proteinmedia.com (Phillip Compton) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 06:12:53 -0500 Subject: Orphaned and potentially unmaintained packages In-Reply-To: <20050129222951.13be6bcd.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> References: <20050129222951.13be6bcd.fedora@wir-sind-cool.org> Message-ID: <1107169974.5239.2.camel@earlgrey.compton.net> On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 22:29 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Long overdue, a list of unmaintained and potentially unmaintained > packages: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/OrphanedPackages > I've already been maintaining screem informally. I can take over it, if no one else is interested. Phil From skvidal at fedoraproject.org Mon Jan 31 19:57:02 2005 From: skvidal at fedoraproject.org (seth vidal) Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:57:02 -0500 Subject: Fedora Extras Package Updates Message-ID: <1107201422.30076.36.camel@opus.phy.duke.edu> Hi Everyone, rrdtool - x86, x86_64 yasm - x86, x86_64 lmarbles - x86, x86_64 synergy - x86, x86_64 General FC3 extras status: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras_2fFC3Status Follow updates and new packages at: http://fedoraproject.org/infofeed/ Report problems at Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/ Thanks, -sv