An Extras package request.

[Gain Paolo Mureddu]

Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:

>On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 17:06, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano wrote:
>  
>
>>On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 16:27, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 18:17:51 -0600, Gain Paolo Mureddu wrote:
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Michael Schwendt wrote:
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>Saw it in the fedora.us queue long ago, and... it had several issues
>>>>>apart from low priority: https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=619
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>I haven't seen any of those mentioned problems when buiding the whole 
>>>>package from source, but your mileage may vary.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Well, that was end of 2003, now we have 2005. Also, packaging up the whole
>>>thing with RPM requires a bit more than just compiling the source code.
>>>Feel free to contribute packages for the FOX toolkit and the audio editor
>>>you refer to. It's good to have alternatives and competition in that area.
>>>      
>>>
>>I already have packages available as part of the Planet CCRMA repository
>>(for both). I don't have (yet) Fedora Extras cvs access so I can't
>>contribute directly, but I could send spec files and/or patches if that
>>would help. 
>>
>>Rezound is nice, but it has an additional (admittedly optional)
>>dependency, the Jack Audio Connection Kit. That is one of the packages
>>that I would eventually like to help include in FE as a _lot_ of very
>>nice audio packages depend on Jack being available. 
>>    
>>
>
>And another one I forgot about, don't know if it is already in FE:
>http://sky.prohosting.com/oparviai/soundtouch/
>(I also have packages for this)
>-- Fernando
>
>
>--
>fedora-extras-list mailing list
>fedora-extras-list at redhat.com
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-extras-list
>
>  
>
Looks very interesting, but I wonder how does this differ from some 
LADSPA plug-ins that do this?