Request for review: koffice
Rex Dieter
rdieter at math.unl.edu
Fri Jul 1 12:39:27 UTC 2005
Andreas Bierfert wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>>For the love of all that is holy, please package the langpack files
>>separately (altogether or separate src.rpm's I don't care, just as long
>>as they are .noarch.rpm's), and follow upstream naming.
> Befor I do that...
> - - build of language stuff ties in with koffice nicely
And what if a patch is released for a single koffice-l10
tarball/language? You'll to rebuild *the whole friggin thing*.
Besides, the koffice lang packages *really* should be noarch (and could
possibly be shared among all distro/releases/archs).
> - - ooo langpack files are within the main package as well
AFAICT, no they aren't. ???
> - - naming is exactly like ooo naming which IMHO is better for fedora users
ooo doesn't have separate, upstream language packs. Apples/Oranges.
-- Rex
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list