Reviews still needed

Tom 'spot' Callaway tcallawa at redhat.com
Sun Jul 3 14:10:51 UTC 2005


On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 17:19 +0200, Christian.Iseli at licr.org wrote:
> tcallawa at redhat.com said:
> > Policy changed at FUDCon II. Basically, it is now ok for packages to not
> > build on some architectures, as long as its documented that they do not. 
> 
> Ok.  In that case, the questions I asked in
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-June/msg00488.html
> still stand (except for the compiler warnings, which can be ignored for x86 :-)

All of those issues are now resolved in CVS. Care to re-review (or
approve)? :)

~spot
-- 
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list