Request for review: libxslt-plugin-regexp and libxslt-plugin-dates-and-times

[Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams]

On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 16:47 -0400, joel reed wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 02:41:40PM -0400, fedora-extras-list-request at redhat.com wrote:
> > From: Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez at ivazquez.net>
> > Subject: Re: Request for review: libxslt-plugin-regexp and
> > 	libxslt-plugin-dates-and-times
> > To: Discussion related to Fedora Extras
> > 	<fedora-extras-list at redhat.com>
> > 
> > On Fri, 2005-07-08 at 13:20 -0400, joel reed wrote:
> > > http://home.comcast.net/~joelwreed/libxslt-plugin-regexp.spec
> > 
> > - Versions in Requires, BuildRequires, and %description need to be fixed
> > up
> > - Either add "Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig
> > \nRequires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig" or change the %post[un] lines to
> > "%... -p /sbin/ldconfig"
> 
> thank you for the feedback.
> 
> i think this part:
> 
> %post
> /sbin/ldconfig
> 
> %postun
> /sbin/ldconfig
> 
> can actually be deleted. then i don't need Requires(post) and Requires(postun)
> suggestions, right? i think they can be deleted because these plugin .so files
> are loaded dynamically be libxslt from "/usr/lib/libxslt/1.1/".

Fair enough.

> my machine has:
> 
> (%:~/src/libxslt-plugin-regexp-0.5) ls -1 /usr/lib/libxslt/1.1/
> exslt_org_dates_and_times.la
> exslt_org_dates_and_times.so
> exslt_org_regular_expressions.la
> exslt_org_regular_expressions.so

I think you can ditch the .la files.

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazquez at ivazquez.net>
http://fedora.ivazquez.net/

gpg --keyserver hkp://subkeys.pgp.net --recv-key 38028b72
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050708/70f3d273/attachment.sig>