http://fedoraproject.org/extras/4/i386/repodata/

[Matthew Miller]

On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 01:14:12PM -0400, Chris Ricker wrote:
> I think that's all doable with current comps
> (1) doesn't require comps at all
> (2) would be groups which list related apps, most type="optional", 
> best-of-breed one type="default"
> (3) would be groups which list related apps, most type="default"

Yeah, this would be one approach. I think it'd be extremely useful to have
something which distinguishes between the two types of groups, though.

> For (2) vs (3), are you envisioning categorizing all of Fedora space twice 
> (once into type-2 groups, once into type-3 groups), or are you envisioning 
> careful group creation (web-server as a type-2 group, games as a type-3 
> group)?

I think basically one and a half, or 1.2x -- everything into one or more
type-based category, and carefully selected programs into "Component"
groups.

-- 
Matthew Miller           mattdm at mattdm.org        <http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux      ------>                <http://linux.bu.edu/>
Current office temperature: 78 degrees Fahrenheit.