http://fedoraproject.org/extras/4/i386/repodata/

[Jeff Spaleta]

On 7/15/05, Eric R. Meyers <ermeyers at adelphia.net> wrote:
> I'm not going to disagree with you.  This is a discussion.  I was thinking
> purely from the perspective of the user wanting a web-server, versus the user
> wanting an addon to a webserver.  The more we mix the fuzzier the group will
> be.  It was an example.

And if micro catagorize across the whole package space to that extent
you will have hundreds of groups in a flat list. For all the tools
that are group aware, this is a untenable situation for UI.
You can't just think about repoview... you have to think about how
this is going to look in anaconda or s-c-packages (or whatever
replaces s-c-packages) as these tools present groups to users.  200
groups exposed during a yum enabled anaconda based install.. is not
going to be a good thing.
-jef