libxml++ is old
Panu Matilainen
pmatilai at laiskiainen.org
Thu Jul 21 06:47:43 UTC 2005
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On 20/07/05, Daniel Veillard <veillard at redhat.com> wrote:
>> libxml v1 is dead.
>> the libxml++ jump in numbering isn't as drastic a jump as it was
>> for libxml. And I would rather avoid keeping dual versions for the
>> C++ bindings if there is nothing really requiring the old one. So
>> back to the core question: what is using libxml C++ bindings ?
>
> Looks like nothing requires it. I can add this to my collection of
> maintained packages, since I need to have it to package granule
> anyway. Unless there are other claimants, of course.
It's all yours :) Better to have somebody maintain it who actually uses it
as well.
- Panu -
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list