Request for review: koffice

[Warren Togami]

Andreas Bierfert wrote:
> I don't care one or the other way... just as long as we agree.
> 
> (i) one srpm for all of koffice
> 
> (ii) one srpm for koffice and one for koffice-lang stuff
> 
> (iii) one srpm for koffice and lots of other srpms for lang stuff
> 
> I would choose (ii) because it does not jam the cvs to much but keeps
> things a little bit more organized. Even with the downside of upgrading
> all installed lang files if only one lang source changes.
> 

(ii) reflects reality while (iii) does not.  When koffice has new 
versions, it will have new/changed strings and ALL language packs need 
to be updated anyway.

Warren Togami
wtogami at redhat.com