build status

[seth vidal]

On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 11:05 -0500, Quentin Spencer wrote:
> seth vidal wrote:
> 
> >On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 06:37 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>Once upon a time Wednesday 27 July 2005 6:30 am, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>What would be interesting to learn is what buildsys messages require action
> >>>by the packager. I've yet to see a single success report. Should I have
> >>>received a message for a successful build?
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>Yes you get a email stating  that the build was successful.  right now  Seth 
> >>is going to re-queue  failed builds  and Dan  is going to work on some code  
> >>to requeue  failed builds automatically.  Well that was what was discussed on 
> >>irc yesterday.
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >well I'm going to requeue failed builds that failed for repository
> >reasons or for other build-system-related reasons.
> >
> >if a build failed b/c someone didn't upload a tarball  I'm not requeuing
> >it. :)
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> There have been hints that the tobuild file is on its way out. Until 
> then, what if my build failed because of a mistake in the spec file? I 
> fixed the spec, bumped the version, and re-requested the build. Should I 
> remove the old one from the tobuild file to avoid it being re-queued, or 
> will that happen automatically if there's a new one (like the old build 
> system did)?
> 

remove the old one, yes.

always remove broken items from the tobuild file

also remove successful ones.

-sv