Request for review: koffice

[Andreas Bierfert]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Rex Dieter wrote:
> For the love of all that is holy, please package the langpack files
> separately (altogether or separate src.rpm's I don't care, just as long
> as they are .noarch.rpm's), and follow upstream naming.

Befor I do that...

- - build of language stuff ties in with koffice nicely
- - ooo langpack files are within the main package as well
- - naming is exactly like ooo naming which IMHO is better for fedora users

Just some points for you to understand why I did it this way. Any other comments
on the more important parts of the spec file?

- - Andreas
- --
Andreas Bierfert               | http://awbsworld.de      | GPG: C58CF1CB
andreas.bierfert at lowlatency.de | http://lowlatency.de     | signed/encrypted
phone: +49 2402 102373         | cell: +49 172 9789968    | mail preferred
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCxR+dQEQyPsWM8csRApAdAJ4hVrTteqL1jNRfdabnvC5PwvDltwCeKhdb
8vrAoisBpSMEhwxuoKYsCjk=
=vzHV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----