Reviews still needed

[Tom 'spot' Callaway]

On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 16:19 +0200, Christian.Iseli at licr.org wrote:
> Hi Spot,
> 
> tcallawa at redhat.com said:
> > gambas (x86 only): https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/
> > 2005-June/msg00454.html 
> 
> Erm, in
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-June/msg00535.html
> you stated:
> > Gambas is not endian clean, nor is it 64 bit clean. Until such time that
> > the upstream maintainer decides to resolve these issues somewhat, I'm
> > withdrawing my request for review.
> 
> Did you change your mind ?

Policy changed at FUDCon II. Basically, it is now ok for packages to not
build on some architectures, as long as its documented that they do not.

~spot
-- 
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!