Request for Review: Rekall and dependencies

Tom 'spot' Callaway tcallawa at redhat.com
Fri Jul 1 18:15:02 UTC 2005


On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 17:14 +0200, Adrian Reber wrote:

> + source matches upstream
> + builds in mock
> + -devel subpackage with .a, .so, headers and documentation
> 
> - builds not on my system because of missing BR: doxygen
> 
> According to http://fedoraproject.org/buildgroups/4/i386/buildroots.xml
> doxygen is part of build and therefore it works in mock. But as it is
> not part of
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#head-5e0efda65c4d4266d60c269ced6ea1c28051cb6e
> I think it has to be added.

Agreed. Fixed.

> Maybe only the html documentation or the latex should be part of the
> package and not both. Especially as the tex files are not compiled it
> probably makes more sense to only include the html docs.

Fixed.

New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/xbase.spec
New SRPM:
http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/xbase-2.0.0-2.src.rpm

Please review. :)

~spot
-- 
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list