mock build fails

[Ralf Corsepius]

On Mon, 2005-07-04 at 17:34 -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> > FE doesn't have any control over what they do. RH has the freedom to
> > apply whatever development policy they prefer, no matter what users
> > think about it or how harmful it might be to RH.
> > 
> > > All it means is: "This bug is fixed and will be released eventually"
> > The same way yum now supports "--download-only" and the same way yelp
> > meanwhile supports reading man pages and info files?
> > 
> 
> what are you talking about?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109002#c1

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=133052#c2

>  yum dropped support for download-only in the
> 2.1.X branch and it was 'brought back' via yum-utils.
> 
> nothing more.

> I don't know how I pissed in your cornflakes
Then I'll tell you:

You are shipping a broken package at full conciousness about its
brokenness and refuse to withdraw or fix this package. Conversely, you
continue to tell users where to grab the sources and to rebuild the
package themselves.

> It's not helpful nor conducive to a productive environment.
YOU are this package's developer and maintainer.

Ralf