mock build fails
Michael Wiktowy
mwiktowy at gmx.net
Mon Jul 4 22:38:28 UTC 2005
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109002#c1
>
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=133052#c2
>
<snip>
>You are shipping a broken package at full conciousness about its
>brokenness and refuse to withdraw or fix this package. Conversely, you
>continue to tell users where to grab the sources and to rebuild the
>package themselves.
>
>
<snip>
>YOU are this package's developer and maintainer.
>
>Ralf
>
>
Oh the draaaama!
I think those bugs quite adequately explain what is going on and where
to find and track progress.
Personally, I appreciate a more conservative approach to updating yum. A
truly broken updater is one of the things that can totally break your
system. Keeping non-critical bugs for the sake of not introducing
critical bugs by pushing out a version too early is wise. The lack of
--download-only functionality is a non-critical bug for me and I suspect
many people.
If it is truly critical for you than a work-around might be to whip up a
script that takes the output of "yum list updates" and, with reference
to the files in /etc/yum/repo.d/ or your favourite mirror site, feeds it
to wget ... or just get the upstream cvs, build it yourself and deal
with the other potential problems that most are happy to avoid. Please
do not force your priorities and haste on everyone else.
/Mike
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list