Request for review: gif2png

[Enrico Scholz]

adrian at lisas.de (Adrian Reber) writes:

>> http://ensc.de/fedora/gif2png.spec
>> http://ensc.de/fedora/gif2png-2.5.1-1.src.rpm
> ...
> APPROVED
>
> non-blockers:
>  * libpng-devel already requires zlib-devel

ok, removed


> And I haven't seen this in other spec files yet: What is the difference
> between "%{version}" and "%version"? If there is any difference at
> all...

It is like '$foo' and '${foo}' in the shell; braces are avoiding
ambiguities and allow additional tricks (e.g. '%{?') but are not
needed for most cases.



Enrico
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 480 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050710/ed6d2369/attachment.sig>