Request for review: cogito

[Tom 'spot' Callaway]

On Sun, 2005-07-10 at 12:33 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Neil Horman, Chris Wright, and now you have all expressed interest in
> > maintaining cogito. Previous requests were halted, due to concerns about
> > the maturity level of the software. I suspect at this point its fine
> > (and there is obviously demand). The three of you should figure out who
> > will own this, then I'll be happy to review the end package.
> 
> I have no great desire to do it, just a desire to have it there and a
> willingness to help make it happen.  No matter how immature it is, we are
> using it today (and there is nothing very mature available to deal with
> Linus's repositories).  So might as well have it easy to install.
> 
> If we can't put immature but packageable and usable software into Extras,
> then we'll just have to have yet another infrastructure like Extras for us
> to collaborate on the Fedora-standard nonstandard stuff.  I don't see why
> anyone would want that.  

I agree entirely. I'm not against cogito in the slightest (never have
been). I just want to make sure that there is no disagreement in who
should be maintaining it.

~spot
-- 
Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Senior Sales Engineer || GPG ID: 93054260
Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices)
Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org
Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!