Request for a sponsor and a review of: pam_abl

[Alexander Dalloz]

Am Di, den 12.07.2005 schrieb Oliver Falk um 10:00:

> > http://www.uni-x.org/pam_abl-0.2.2-20050110.src.rpm
> > http://www.uni-x.org/pam_abl.spec

> Tried this, but get the following, if I enable pam_abl in system-auth:
> 
> Jul 12 09:53:24 moon sshd[1944]: PAM unable to resolve symbol: 
> pam_sm_open_session
> Jul 12 09:53:24 moon sshd[1944]: PAM unable to resolve symbol: 
> pam_sm_close_session
> 
> :-/

Hi Oliver,

on which system does it fail? I am running pam_abl on CentOS4 and it
builds and runs properly.

That leads me directly to the question: is it necessary to test software
builds on FC4 with it's latest gcc? 

> Specfile:
> * Release should be 1%{?dist}

Ok, so the dist tag seems to be mandatory, other than the wiki says.

> * You should not make
> * rpmlint complains:
> W: pam_abl non-standard-group Base

Group: System Environment/Base
would be correct?

> E: pam_abl hardcoded-library-path in /lib/security/$ISA/pam_abl.so

Where is that error triggered from?

> * Do not add an 'install howto' in the description.

Ok, will include a small README.Fedora file.

> So far... For sure there are other things as well, but I had no closer 
> look at the pkg, since it doesn't work here... :-/
> 
> Best,
>   Oliver

Alexander


-- 
 
1024D/866ED681 2005-07-11 Alexander Dalloz (Fedora Project) <alex at dalloz.de>
Key fingerprint = CD40 0A91 7814 C1E4 5940  8E0E 1FD5 C316 866E D681

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050713/d17edfe4/attachment.sig>