Request for a sponsor and a review of: pam_abl

Oliver Falk oliver at linux-kernel.at
Wed Jul 13 12:35:46 UTC 2005


On 07/13/2005 02:23 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-07-12 at 10:00 +0200, Oliver Falk wrote:
> 
>>Tried this, but get the following, if I enable pam_abl in system-auth:
>>
>>Jul 12 09:53:24 moon sshd[1944]: PAM unable to resolve symbol: 
>>pam_sm_open_session
>>Jul 12 09:53:24 moon sshd[1944]: PAM unable to resolve symbol: 
>>pam_sm_close_session
> 
> You've added pam_abl to the session stage but it doesn't have this stage
> implemented (no functionality would be there).
> 
> It should be added only to the auth and account stages.

I just did what the documentation told me to do:
/usr/share/pam_abl-0.2.2/conf/system-auth:

#%PAM-1.0
auth        required      /lib/security/$ISA/pam_env.so
auth        required      /lib/security/$ISA/pam_abl.so 
config=/etc/security/pam_abl.conf
auth        sufficient    /lib/security/$ISA/pam_unix.so likeauth nullok
auth        required      /lib/security/$ISA/pam_deny.so

account     required      /lib/security/$ISA/pam_unix.so

password    required      /lib/security/$ISA/pam_cracklib.so retry=3 type=
password    sufficient    /lib/security/$ISA/pam_unix.so nullok 
use_authtok md5 shadow
password    required      /lib/security/$ISA/pam_deny.so

session     required      /lib/security/$ISA/pam_limits.so
session     required      /lib/security/$ISA/pam_abl.so
session     required      /lib/security/$ISA/pam_unix.so

So, you tell me, that the documentation is wrong? If so Alexander must 
change this... In the RPM at least and maybe contact the author of 
pam_abl to change this...

Best,
  Oliver




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list