Request for a sponsor and a review of: pam_abl
Matthias Saou
thias at spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.spam.egg.and.spam.freshrpms.net
Wed Jul 13 16:04:07 UTC 2005
Jeff Pitman wrote :
> On Wednesday 13 July 2005 23:30, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > You are free to ignore such recommendations. I, for instance, would
> > not like to be forced to add %{?dist} for a noarch/data package,
> > which doesn't need a rebuild for the next distribution.
>
> What about /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/foo in FC5 and
> then /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/foo in FC6?
>
> Lots of noarchs need rebuild for next distro. Especially those that
> involve ver-dependent directory structures.
I think Micheal was referring to stuff such as game data files, which
weigh many megabytes and usually don't need to be rebuilt for the next
distribution. So adding %{?dist} to those does seems silly.
Matthias
--
Clean custom Red Hat Linux rpm packages : http://freshrpms.net/
Fedora Core release 4 (Stentz) - Linux kernel 2.6.12-1.1390_FC4.s3
Load : 0.28 0.36 0.65
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list