http://fedoraproject.org/extras/4/i386/repodata/
seth vidal
skvidal at phy.duke.edu
Wed Jul 13 18:10:15 UTC 2005
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 14:04 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On 7/13/05, seth vidal <skvidal at phy.duke.edu> wrote:
> > I need to add a 'pull comps.xml from cvs' to the extras-push script so
> > it gets updated with any regularity.
>
> Would there be a need for branch specific comps.xml files since
> fc3,fc4 and devel have different package collections available in
> extras?
i think different ones per release makes sense.
> Or is it fine to have one comps.xml file that includes
> references to packages that aren't in a tree?
you can but it looks sloppy
> Would a missing
> mandatory group member screw up groupinstall commands?
it won't. missing group members are not fatal errors for yum.
> Also would it make since for there to be an equivalent to the tag and
> build request action packages have for the comps.xml, so that your
> scripted pull gets only a version tagged for consumption instead of
> some interim version thats being worked on?
I don't see any reason why we would apply different rules to the
comps.xml file than to the packages themselves.
-sv
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list