http://fedoraproject.org/extras/4/i386/repodata/

[Jeremy Katz]

On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 14:04 -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On 7/13/05, seth vidal <skvidal at phy.duke.edu> wrote:
> > I need to add a 'pull comps.xml from cvs' to the extras-push script so
> > it gets updated with any regularity.
> 
> Would there be a need for branch specific comps.xml files since
> fc3,fc4 and devel have different package collections available in
> extras? Or is it fine to have one comps.xml file that includes
> references to packages that aren't in a tree? Would a missing
> mandatory group member screw up groupinstall commands?

Missing packages shouldn't cause problems.  At the same time, I'd
recommend comps-fe3.xml, comps-fe4.xml, etc.  That mirrors what we do
with Core (and allows you to change the groups over time)

> Also would it make since for there to be an equivalent to the tag and
> build request action packages have for the comps.xml, so that your
> scripted pull gets only a version tagged for consumption instead of
> some interim version thats being worked on?

Tagging isn't a bad idea, probably more like the tagging for the website
than for packages, though.

Jeremy