Request for a sponsor and a review of: pam_abl

[Jeff Pitman]

On Thursday 14 July 2005 18:48, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Mandatory dist tags give a false impression of upgrade-path safety.

*shrug* 

If they don't need disttags, that means they can move over across a dist 
upgrade which gives a false impression of upgrade-path safety.

In fact, the rest of your points can be readily applied to packages that 
don't need disttags, but float across dist upgrades.

In other words, we're going in circles when it's really unnecessary.

If we're just saving a rebuild by dropping a %{?dist}, I don't really 
see that as a huge plus.  Cause, I don't think CPUs will be going on 
strike any time soon.

-- 
-jeff