Review nautilus-open-terminal was Re: No more right click terminal

[Paul Nasrat]

On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 18:25 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 17:30 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 16:26 -0400, Paul Nasrat wrote:
> > > > > > http://rpm.frields.org/FC5/nautilus-open-terminal/
> > > > 
> > > > Done, requested cvsextras group membership to go with my other existing
> > > > ones.  Paul N., are you willing to check this over?  If not, anyone
> > > > else?
> > > 
> > > Review based on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines it's
> > > been a while since I did QA.
> > > 
> > > Source against upstream and independant download:
> > > 
> > > http://manny.cluecoder.org/packages/nautilus-open-terminal/nautilus-open-terminal-0.4.tar.gz.md5
> > > md5 931a50e602f60340a5ed369f50146f36  nautilus-open-terminal-0.4.tar.gz
> > > 
> > > Source License is GPL, no known legal issues.
> > > 
> > > Builds locally using rpmbuild and mock - so buildrequires form all
> > > requirements.
> > > 
> > > Terminal menu appears after logout/login and using nautilus -q (tested
> > > both mock built and system built package)
> > > 
> > > However:
> > > 
> > > rpmlint gives:
> > > W: nautilus-open-terminal devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-1.0/libnautilus-open-terminal.a
> > > E: nautilus-open-terminal
> > > script-without-shellbang /usr/lib/nautilus/extensions-1.0/libnautilus-open-terminal.la
> > > 
> > > Indeed - you probably just want to nuke the .a and .la files
> > 
> > Done.  See 0.4-3 at same location.  Sorry I missed the section on
> > rpmlint; everyone has to start somewhere, I suppose.  I'll be sure to
> > use it in the future (and reread spot's Guidelines).
> 
> Sorry to reply to myself.  New off-Broadway version 0.4-4 fixes other
> discrepancies from spot's reviewer guidelines:
> 
> http://rpm.frields.org/FC5/nautilus-open-terminal/

I see nothing...

and I really want to get this through so we can concentrate on
possibilities for it in Core...


Paul