Request for review : gkrellm-bmp

Brian Pepple bdpepple at ameritech.net
Sat Jul 16 14:16:53 UTC 2005


On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 21:21 +0200, Matthias Saou wrote:
> Well, in that case, I'd be interested in hearing your comments regarding
> the possibility of having a "gkrellm-xmms" package that would obsolete
> "gkrellmms". You can find such a package next to the "gkrellm-bmp" one. A
> quick review of both would be much appreciated too ;-)
> 

The specs look ok, but is there any reason for not following the
upstream name?  According to the wiki, we should try to follow the
upstream name, and I don't see any compelling reason not to follow that.

/B
-- 
Brian Pepple <bdpepple at ameritech.net>

gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E
BD5E 6F9E 8688 E668 8F5B  CBDE 326A E936 810C C15E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050716/d6040761/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list