Request for Review: nethack

Luke Macken lmacken at redhat.com
Tue Jul 19 17:26:50 UTC 2005


On Tue, Jul 19, 2005 at 06:40:45PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
| On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 11:00 -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
| > | SPEC: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/nethack.spec
| > | SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/lmacken/nethack-3.4.3-1.src.rpm
| > 
| > So, anyone care to review/approve this so I import it into CVS ?
| 
| A quick peek into the specfile, not a full review:
| 
| Nobody has stepped up and wanted to continue maintaining
| nethack-falconseye, so I'd suggest removing the Conflicts, and adding a
| "Obsoletes: nethack-falconseye <= 1.9.4-6.a".

Fixed.

| You're listing stuff in the data dir as normal files, which would mean
| for example the "record" file being silently overwritten on upgrades.
| I'm pretty certain that people wouldn't like that at all ;).  I don't
| remember what's stored in "perm" and "logfile", but those should be
| checked, too.  My nethack-falconseye lists everything in the data dir as
| %config(noreplace) which isn't probably the prettiest solution, but at
| least it prevents the files from being overwritten on upgrades, and from
| removed (if modified) on erase.

Good call.  Fixed.

It looks like no one has any problems with this package being included in
extras, so I'll go ahead an import it to CVS and wait for it to get APPROVED.

luke




More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list