libxml++ is old

[Daniel Veillard]

On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 12:04:29AM -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-07-19 at 17:46 -1000, Warren Togami wrote:
> > Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> > > Hi, all:
> > > 
> > > libxml++ in the tree is pretty ancient. In fact, it was last touched
> > > in 2003 and was migrated from fedora.us. Any way we can move on to
> > > libxml++-2.6? Does anything depend on the old API?
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > 
> > You do realize that we have libxml2?
> > 
> > % rpm -q libxml2
> > libxml2-2.6.19-1
> 
> libxml++ is C++ bindings for libxml/libxml2.

  Right, well more precisely it is *one* of the C++ bindings for libxml2
though those days it clearly the most popular. The question still remains:
what uses it ? If there was really a shortage for maintainers and a need
I could try to handle it myself, but I would rather delegate :-)

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/
veillard at redhat.com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/