libxml++ is old

[Konstantin Ryabitsev]

On 20/07/05, Daniel Veillard <veillard at redhat.com> wrote:
>   libxml v1 is dead.
>   the libxml++ jump in numbering isn't as drastic a jump as it was
> for libxml. And I would rather avoid keeping dual versions for the
> C++ bindings if there is nothing really requiring the old one. So
> back to the core question: what is using libxml C++ bindings ?

Looks like nothing requires it. I can add this to my collection of
maintained packages, since I need to have it to package granule
anyway. Unless there are other claimants, of course.

Cheers,
-- 
Konstantin Ryabitsev
Zlotniks, INC

"Выслухаў мядзьведзь казку і адарваў сабе хвост."