libxml++ is old

[Panu Matilainen]

On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:

> On 20/07/05, Daniel Veillard <veillard at redhat.com> wrote:
>>   libxml v1 is dead.
>>   the libxml++ jump in numbering isn't as drastic a jump as it was
>> for libxml. And I would rather avoid keeping dual versions for the
>> C++ bindings if there is nothing really requiring the old one. So
>> back to the core question: what is using libxml C++ bindings ?
>
> Looks like nothing requires it. I can add this to my collection of
> maintained packages, since I need to have it to package granule
> anyway. Unless there are other claimants, of course.

It's all yours :) Better to have somebody maintain it who actually uses it 
as well.

 	- Panu -