Request for review: koffice

Ralf Corsepius rc040203 at freenet.de
Fri Jul 22 07:41:23 UTC 2005


On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 08:40 +0200, Andreas Bierfert wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Jeff Pitman wrote:
> > That's what I was thinking. This is what I'm doing for Python-Twisted 
> > 2.x, who've split their packages and use different Versions for each 
> > sub-package. Doing so creates an upgrade path from the previous 
> > monolithic package.
> 
> 
> Just one question with this: Having a koffice-suite package which obsoletes
> koffice (and -i18n) and Requires all the subpackages from the new version should
> do the trick on update. The question is what is needed in koffice-core? Also
> Obsolete the old version or Conflict the old version? What is the best way to go?

Check the openoffice specs in Core. They seem to be trying to achieve
the same between FC3 and FC4 versions.

Ralf





More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list