Request for review: lzo2

Alexander Dalloz alex at dalloz.de
Thu Jul 28 23:42:03 UTC 2005


Am Do, den 28.07.2005 schrieb Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams um 17:58:
> On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 16:21 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 11:21 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 16:36 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> > > > http://www.uni-x.org/review/lzo2.spec
> > > 
> > > - Erase the .la file instead of using %exclude
> > 
> > Why?
> 
> On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 17:26 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote: 
> > I have no problem to do so. Would be kind if you could explain me why
> > the "%exclude" is wrong. It is the same as used in the lzo-1.08 Extras
> > package spec.
> 
> It messes up the package's metadata.
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89661

Ignacio,

thank you for that information. Curiously I do not see a difference
whether I "%exclude" the .la file in %files (-1 release) or whether I rm
it in %install (-2 release):

$ ~/rpmsizetest.sh lzo2-2.01-1.i386.rpm
*     143201     143185 lzo2-2.01-1.i386.rpm

$ ~/rpmsizetest.sh lzo2-2.01-2.i386.rpm
*     143201     143185 lzo2-2.01-2.i386.rpm

Alexander


-- 
 
1024D/866ED681 2005-07-11 Alexander Dalloz (Fedora Project) <alex at dalloz.de>
Key fingerprint = CD40 0A91 7814 C1E4 5940  8E0E 1FD5 C316 866E D681

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/attachments/20050729/86668485/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-extras-list mailing list