package submission policy question
Chris Ricker
kaboom at oobleck.net
Thu Jun 2 11:06:29 UTC 2005
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, seth vidal wrote:
> I made the joke about porn but, well, if I had a package of
> license-compatible porn and a special viewer for it I think people would
> raise a fit about including it.
Unfortunately, the special porn viewers are all in livna due to codec
licensing / patents / etc ;-)
> maybe it would be best for fedora extras to stay out of the content
> business, just provide the ways to access the content.
Sometimes content inclusion's the whole point though - fortune-mod being a
good example
later,
chris
More information about the fedora-extras-list
mailing list